Zu Arbeitseigenschaften und Bruchanfälligkeit eines experimentellen Instrumentensystems für die Wurzelkanalaufbereitung

Zielsetzung: Ein experimentelles Instrumentensystem, mit drei verschiedenen Prototypen, wurde hinsichtlich Bruchneigung und morphologischer Wurzelkanalveränderungen verglichen. Material und Methode: Artifizielle Wurzelkanäle aus Kunststoff wurden mit drei Prototyp Feilen bis zur ISO Größe 30 aufber...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: Acker, Matthias
Beteiligte: Stoll, Richard (Prof. Dr.) (BetreuerIn (Doktorarbeit))
Format: Dissertation
Sprache:Deutsch
Veröffentlicht: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2010
Zahn-, Mund- u. Kieferheilkunde
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:PDF-Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

1. Zand V, Bidar M, Ghaziani P, Rahimi S, Shahi S: A comaparative SEM investigation of the smear layer following preparation of root canals using nickel titanium rotary and hand instruments. J Oral Sci. 49.1: 47-52 (2007).


2. Schneider SW: A comparison of canal preparation in straight an curved canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path. 32: 271-276 (1971).


3. Tharuni SL, Parameswaran A, Sukumaran V G: A comparison of canal preparation using the K-file and Lightspeed in resin blocks. J Endod 22: 474-476 (1996).


4. Short J A, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC: A comparison of four instrumentation techniques. J Endod 22: 194 (1996).


5. Powell SE, Simon JH, Maze BB: A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified tips on apical canal configuration. J Endod. 12.7: 193-300 (1986).


6. Williamson AE, Sandor AJ, Justman BC: A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems. EndoSequence, Pro Taper universal and profile GT for canal-cleaning ability. J Endod. 35.1: 107-9 (2009).


7. Lehman J W, Gerstein H: An evaluation of a new mechanized endodontic device: the Endolift. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 53.4: 417-24 (1982).


8. Walia H M, Brantley W A, Gerstein H: An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files.


9. An In Vitro Comparison of Torsional Stress and Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files. J Endod. 35.3: 404-7 (2009).


10. Wildey WL, Senia ES, Montgomery S: Another look at root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.74.4:499- 507 (1992).


11. Poertzel E, Petschelt A: Bakterien in der Wurzelkanalwand. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 41: 772-77 (1985).


12. Kockapan C: Überfüllung in den Mandibularkanal als endodontische Komplikation. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 103: 20-28 (1993).


13. Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Il Young J, Seung-Jong, Chan-Young L: Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod. 26: 719-723 (2000).


14. Schilder H: Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 18.2: 269-96 (1974).


15. Guelzow A, Stamm O, Martus P, Kielbassa AM: Comparative study of six nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J. 38: 743-752 (2005).


16. Xu X, Eng M, Zheng Y, Eng D: Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six models of nickel- titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections. J Endod. 32.4: 372-5 (2006).


17. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerov K: Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod. Nov; 34.11: 1406-9 (2008).


18. Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G: Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod. 30: 432-5 (2004).


19. Krajczár K, Marada G, Gyulai G, Tóth V: Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatinal and mesiobuccal root canals of extracted upper molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 106.2: 90-93 (2008).


20. Walton R E: Current concepts of canal preparation. Dent Clin North Am. 36.2: 309-26 (1992).


21. Cyclic fatigue analyses of a new generation of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 35.3:401-3 (2009).


22. Tripi TR, Bonaccorso A, Condorelli GG: Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 102.4:106-14 (2006).


23. Ray JJ, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE: Cyclic Fatigue of EndoSequence and K3 Rotary Files in a Dynamic Model. J Endod. 33.12: 1469-72 (2007).


24. Lopes HP, Moreira EJ, Elias CN, de Almeida RA, Neves MS: Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper instruments. J Endod. Jan; 33.1: 55-7 (2007).


25. Inan U, Aydin C, Tunca YM: Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper rotary nickel-titanium instruments in artificial canals with 2 different radii of curvature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. Dec; 104.6: 837-40 (2007).


26. Yao JH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ: Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model. J Endod. 32.1: 55-7 (2006).


27. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 23(2) Feb: 77-85 (1997).


28. Shen Y, Haapsalo, Cheung GS, Peng B: Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 1: Relationship between observed imperfections and factors leading to such defects in a cohort study. J Endod. 35.1: 129-32 (2009).


29. Desinfektion des Wurzelkanals-Allgemeine Anforderungen an Medikamente und Spüllösungen. ZWR 116: 292-298 (2007).


30. Haikel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Allemann C: Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 25: 434-40 (1999).


31. Ullmann CJ, Peters OA: Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 31.3: 183-6 (2005).


32. Weine F S, Kelly RF, Bray KE: Effect of preparation with endodontic handpieces on original canal shape. J Endod.


33. Schäfer E: Effects of four instrumentation techniques on curved canals: A comparison study. J Endod. 12: 685-89 (1996).


34. Tronstad L, Niemczyk SP: Efficacy and safety tests of six automated devices for root canal instrumentation.


35. Effizienz maschineller Wurzelkanalaufbereitungssysteme im Vergleich zur manuellen Instrumentierung. Quintessenz. 51: 115 (2000).


36. Eine Vergleichende in-Vitro-Studie zur Maschinellen Wurzelkanalaufbereitung mit den Nickel-Titan-Systemen HERO 642 Und Flex Master. Ed. Medizinische Dissertation. Göttingen: (2001).


37. Endodontie: Maschinell-manuell? Die Aufbereitung und Spülung des Wurzelkanals. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 44: 407-13 (1989).


38. Endodontologie: Grundlagen und Praxis. Dt. Zahnärzte-Verl.,1. Aufl: 66 (2003).


39. Zahnärztliche Wurzelkanalinstrumente. EN-ISO 3630-1: 1994 (Deutsche Fassung) ed: 9-12 (1994).


40. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation oft wo rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments. Int Endod J. 42.1: 22-33 (2009).


41. Schilder H: Filling Root Canals in Three Dimension. Dent Clin North Am. 11: 723-744 (1967).


42. International Organization for Standardization:


43. Maschinelle Wurzelkanalaufbereitung mit Nickel-Titan-Systemen. Bayerisches Zahnärzteblatt. April: 54-56 (2003).


44. Papa J, Cain C , Messer H H: Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 10.2: 91-93 (1994).


45. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio.PJ: The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod. 1.8: 255-62 (1975).


46. Weiger R, Brückner M, ElAyouti A, Löst C: Preparation of curved root canals with rotary FlexMaster instruments compared to Lightspeed instruments and NiTi hand files. Int Endod J. 36.7: 483-90 (2003).


47. Rödig T, Hülsmann M, Mühge E, Schäfers F.: " Quality of preparation of oval distal root canals in mandibular molars using nickel- titanium instruments " . Int Endod J. 35(11): 919-28 (2002)


48. Reeh E S, Messer H H, Douglas W H: Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 15.11: 512-16 (1989).


49. Schäfer E, Tepel J: Relationship Between Design Features of Endodontic Instruments and Their Properties. Part 3. Resistance to Bending and Fracture. J Endod. 27.4: 299-303 (2001).


50. Schäfer E, Diez C, Hoppe W, Tepel J: Roentgenographic investigation of frequency and degree of canal curvatures in human permanent teeth. J Endod. 28: 211-6 (2002).


51. Root-canal preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analyses by microcomputed tomography. Int Endod J. Nov; 36.11: 740-7 (2003).


52. Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim SK, Stachniss V: Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J. 36: 246-55 (2003).


53. Tepel, Schäfer: Schneidleistung von Hedströmfeilen, S-und U-Feilen aus unterschiedlichen Legierungen bei feilender Arbeitsweise. Endodontie. 5: 219-26 (1996).


54. The "balanced force" concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod. 11.5: 203-11 (1985).


55. The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape. Int Endod J. 18: 240-6 (1985).


56. Schäfer E, Fritzenschaft B: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zweier permanent rotierender Wurzelkanalaufbereitungssysteme auf Nickel-Titan-Basis. In: 12. Jahrestagung der Dtsch Gesellschaft für Zahnerhaltung, Bremen. Zusammenfassung der Autorenreferate, o. Hrsg., o. Verl., o.O. 136 (1998).


57. Kim HC, Kim HJ, Lee CJ, Kim BM, Park JK, Versluis A: Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 42.7: 593-602 (2009).


58. Hellwig, Klimek Attin: Einführung in die Zahnerhaltung. München Wien Baltimore: Urban und Schwarzenberg, (1995).