Publikationsserver
Outcome of Surgery for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Depends on the Type and Timing of the Coronary Revascularization
Objective: Long-term outcomes of mitral valve (MV) repair versus MV replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients undergoing either prior (PCR) or concomitant coronary revascularization (CCR) by surgery (CABG) or intervention (PCI) are uncertain. Methods and Results: Of 446 pati...
Gespeichert in:
| Autoren: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Philipps-Universität Marburg
2023
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | PDF-Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Long-term outcomes of mitral valve (MV) repair versus MV replacement
for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients undergoing either prior (PCR) or concomitant
coronary revascularization (CCR) by surgery (CABG) or intervention (PCI) are uncertain. Methods
and Results: Of 446 patients receiving MV surgery for IMR between July 2006 and December 2010,
125 patients—87 CCR (69.1%) and 38 PCR (30.9%)—were eligible for inclusion in the study. Survival
was higher in CCR versus PCR at long-term follow-up (78.83% vs. 57.9%, p = 0.016). The incidence
of MACCE was lower in the CCR compared to PCR at both hospital discharge (34.11% vs. 63.57%,
p = 0.003) and at follow-up (34.11% vs. 65.79%, p = 0.0008). Patients receiving CABG or CABG with
PCI in PCR had higher mortality risks after MV surgery than CCR patients (X2 = 6.029, p = 0.014
and X2 = 6.466, p = 0.011, respectively). Whereas in the PCR group, MV repair and MV replacement
achieved similar survival probability (X2 = 1.551, p = 0.213), MV repair in the CCR group led
to improved survival compared to MV replacement (X2 = 3.921, p = 0.048). In MV replacement,
LAD-CABG improved survival compared to LAD-PCI (U = 15,000.00, Z = ?2.373 p = 0.018), and a
substantial impact of arterial IMA-LAD grafting was revealed in the Cox-regression analysis (HR
0.334, CI: 0.113–0.989, p = 0.048) as opposed to venous-LAD grafting (HR 0.588, CI: 0.166–2.078,
p = 0.410). Conclusion: Early treatment of IMR concomitant to coronary revascularization enhances
long-term survival compared to delayed MV surgery after PCR. MV repair is not superior to MV
replacement when performed late after coronary revascularization; however, MV repair leads to
better survival than MV replacement when performed concomitantly with CABG with arterial LAD
revascularization. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gefördert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der UB Marburg. |
| DOI: | 10.17192/es2024.0414 |