Private provision of public goods: Do individual climate protection efforts depend on perceptions of climate policy?
This paper extends the economic literature on the private provision of public goods by exam-ining the relevance of perceptions of climate policy to voluntary contributions to the public good of climate protection. Based on an analytical model which allows for perceptions of cli-mate policy such as j...
Saved in:
Published in: | MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 53-2014) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This paper extends the economic literature on the private provision of public goods by exam-ining the relevance of perceptions of climate policy to voluntary contributions to the public good of climate protection. Based on an analytical model which allows for perceptions of cli-mate policy such as justification of international climate policy, procedural trust and proce-dural justice to affect voluntary climate protection activities, we examined data from repre-sentative surveys among citizens in the USA and Germany. Our microeconometric analysis confirmed the prediction that the perceived justification of international climate policy is posi-tively related to voluntary contributions to climate protection in both countries. We also found empirical support (mainly for the USA) that higher perceived procedural justice lowers citi-zens’ propensity to adopt climate protection activities. In contrast, we found no support that higher perceived procedural trust reduces citizens’ propensity to adopt such measures. In a broad interpretation, our empirical results imply that individuals’ perceptions about the pro-cess of providing public goods should also be considered when analyzing the factors explain-ing voluntary individual contribution to public goods. |
---|---|
Physical Description: | 26 Pages |
ISSN: | 1867-3678 |
DOI: | 10.17192/es2024.0353 |