How (Not) to Measure Institutions

The statement “institutions matter” has become commonplace. A precondition for it to be supported by empirical evidence, is, however, that institutions are measurable. Glaeser et al. (2004) attacks many studies claiming to prove the relevance of institutions for economic development as being based o...

Täydet tiedot

Tallennettuna:
Bibliografiset tiedot
Julkaisussa:MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 37-2009)
Päätekijä: Voigt, Stefan
Aineistotyyppi: Artikkeli
Kieli:englanti
Julkaistu: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2009
Aiheet:
Linkit:PDF-kokoteksti
Tagit: Lisää tagi
Ei tageja, Lisää ensimmäinen tagi!
Kuvaus
Yhteenveto:The statement “institutions matter” has become commonplace. A precondition for it to be supported by empirical evidence, is, however, that institutions are measurable. Glaeser et al. (2004) attacks many studies claiming to prove the relevance of institutions for economic development as being based on flawed measures of institutions, or not even on institutions at all. This paper shows that their criticism deserves to be taken seriously, but that it is somewhat overblown. Some of the difficulties in measuring institutions are described and some ways of measuring them are proposed.
Ulkoasu:27 Seiten
ISSN:1867-3678
DOI:10.17192/es2024.0018