The Relevance of Judicial Procedure for Economic Growth

It has been argued that procedural formalism undermines economic efficiency by fostering rent-seeking and corruption. We challenge this view by arguing that a number of judicial procedures foster economic growth by increasing the predictability of court decisions, which leads to more transactions...

全面介绍

Gespeichert in:
书目详细资料
发表在:MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 28-2008)
Autoren: Hayo, Bernd, Voigt, Stefan
格式: Arbeit
语言:英语
出版: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2008
主题:
在线阅读:PDF-Volltext
标签: 添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
实物特征
总结:It has been argued that procedural formalism undermines economic efficiency by fostering rent-seeking and corruption. We challenge this view by arguing that a number of judicial procedures foster economic growth by increasing the predictability of court decisions, which leads to more transactions and higher investment levels. We investigate the effects on economic growth of 15 judicial procedures. Employing a standard growth model, we find in a cross-section of 67 countries that timeliness, written—as opposed to oral—procedures, and the right to counsel have a positive effect on growth, whereas the number of independent procedural actions as well as the presumption of innocence have negative effects. Our results partially contradict the results of former studies based on the Lex Mundi dataset.
ISSN:1867-3678
DOI:10.17192/es2023.0214