Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Автори: Oberkircher, Ludwig, Riemenschneider, Julia, Bäumlein, Martin, Knauf, Tom, Bliemel, Christopher, Ruchholtz, Steffen, Krüger, Antonio
Формат: Стаття
Мова:англійська
Опубліковано: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2022
Предмети:
Онлайн доступ:PDF-повний текст
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Опис
Резюме:In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs cervical pedicle screws (CPS)) in the subaxial cervical spine regarding primary stability in a biomechanical testing using a translational injury model.
Опис примірника:Gefördert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der UB Marburg.
Фізичний опис:5 Seiten
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028866