Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs...

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteurs: Oberkircher, Ludwig, Riemenschneider, Julia, Bäumlein, Martin, Knauf, Tom, Bliemel, Christopher, Ruchholtz, Steffen, Krüger, Antonio
Formaat: Artikel
Taal:Engels
Gepubliceerd in: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2022
Onderwerpen:
spine
luxation
fracture
biomechanical
Medizin
lateral mass screw
cervical
pedicle screw
Medical sciences Medicine
Online toegang:PDF Full text
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
Omschrijving
Samenvatting:In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs cervical pedicle screws (CPS)) in the subaxial cervical spine regarding primary stability in a biomechanical testing using a translational injury model.
Beschrijving item:Gefördert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der UB Marburg.
Fysieke beschrijving:5 Seiten
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028866

Gelijkaardige items