Shifting Epistemologies in Area Studies: From Space to Scale

Area studies suffer from various epistemic borderlines which have been drawn and grown during decades of constructing a 'world order' that is ultimately defined by political power relations. The question of what constitutes am 'area' or a 'region' is a timely and contes...

Ful tanımlama

Kaydedildi:
Detaylı Bibliyografya
Yayımlandı:Middle East - Topics & Arguments
Yazar: Derichs, Claudia
Materyal Türü: Daten Artikel (Zeitschrift)
Dil:
İngilizce
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2015
Konular:
Online Erişim:Online Erişim
Kayıt Görüntüle
Etiketler: Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
Diğer Bilgiler
Özet:Area studies suffer from various epistemic borderlines which have been drawn and grown during decades of constructing a 'world order' that is ultimately defined by political power relations. The question of what constitutes am 'area' or a 'region' is a timely and contested one. Moreover, epistemic borderlines have been constructed by a hegemonic way of identifying academic disciplines. The separation between area studies and disciplines, too, is a decision based on global epistemic power relations. The following paragraphs address the constructivist dimension of area studies and disciplines. The main argument is that area studies and disciplines are in no way bound to geographical settings but derive from a politically-informed defining and 'scaling' of localities, ethnicities, languages, religions, and cultures.
DOI:10.17192/meta.2015.4.2981