Shifting Epistemologies in Area Studies: From Space to Scale

Area studies suffer from various epistemic borderlines which have been drawn and grown during decades of constructing a 'world order' that is ultimately defined by political power relations. The question of what constitutes am 'area' or a 'region' is a timely and contes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Middle East - Topics & Arguments (Band 4)
Main Author: Derichs, Claudia
Format: Journal Articles
Language:English
Published: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2015
Center for Near and Middle Eastern Studies (CNMS)
Subjects:
Online Access:7553
3464
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Area studies suffer from various epistemic borderlines which have been drawn and grown during decades of constructing a 'world order' that is ultimately defined by political power relations. The question of what constitutes am 'area' or a 'region' is a timely and contested one. Moreover, epistemic borderlines have been constructed by a hegemonic way of identifying academic disciplines. The separation between area studies and disciplines, too, is a decision based on global epistemic power relations. The following paragraphs address the constructivist dimension of area studies and disciplines. The main argument is that area studies and disciplines are in no way bound to geographical settings but derive from a politically-informed defining and 'scaling' of localities, ethnicities, languages, religions, and cultures.
ISSN:2196-629X
DOI:https://doi.org/10.17192/meta.2015.4.2981