Die Dentinhaftfestigkeit eines experimentellen Universaladhäsivs unter Anwendung verschiedener Applikationsverfahren
Ziel der Studie Das Ziel der Studie war es, die Dentinhaftfestigkeit des experimentellen Universa-ladhäsivs EXP19 im Vergleich zum bekannten ScotchbondTM Universal (3M Oral Care, Seefeld, Deutschland) sowie den Einfluss der Self-Etch- bzw. Etch-and-Rinse-Technik auf den Haftverbund zu untersuchen....
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Beteiligte: | |
Format: | Dissertation |
Sprache: | Deutsch |
Veröffentlicht: |
Philipps-Universität Marburg
2020
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | PDF-Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Aim of the study Aim of the present study was to investigate dentin bond strength of an experimental universal adhesive in comparison to the well-suited ScotchbondTM Universal (3M Oral Care, Seefeld, Germany) and to evaluate the influence of both self-etch and etch-and-rinse technique on bonding performance in high C-factor cavities. Materials and methods Fifty caries-free human third molars received Class-I cavities measuring 4 x 4 x 4 mm, and were randomly assigned to 10 experimental groups (n=5). Cavities were filled with resin composite using various adhesive techniques and exposure times. The uni-versal adhesive EXP19 investigated in this study was used in both self-etch and etch-and-rinse techniques. Duration of application of the adhesive varied between 0 s and 30 s. As a control, ScotchbondTM Universal was also applied using the self-etch and etch-and-rinse technique according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cavities were filled with the resin composite FiltekTM One Bulk Fill Restorative. After cutting com-posite-dentin beams with a cross-sectional area of 1.0 x 1.0 mm, bond strength be-tween dentin and resin composite was determined in a micro tensile test. Finally, the failed resin-dentin interfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope at up to 1000x magnification. Results The experimental adhesive EXP19 did not exhibit sufficient adhesive performance for clinical use in the self-etch approach (ES1: 1.2 ± 3.5 MPa; ES2: 4.2 ± 5.0 MPa; ES3: 5.0 ± 4.2 MPa; ES4: 5.3 ± 3.9). Using the etch-and-rinse technique, low adhesion val-ues were achieved after 0 s or 10 s exposure time (EE1: 0.6 ± 3.0; EE2: 3.9 ± 3.5 MPa). Only in the groups EE3 (7.6 ± 4.2 MPa) and EE4 (9.3 ± 3.6 MPa), the experimental ad-hesive showed sufficient or comparable adhesion values to the control groups (12.4 ± 5.0 MPa) and SCE (8.2 ± 3.9 MPa). The use of the etch-and-rinse technique leads to improved adhesion values after 20 s or 30 s exposure time when EXP19 was used. With ScotchbondTM Universal, slightly higher bond strengths were observed in the self-etch process. Conclusion Within the limits of this in-vitro study, the investigated experimental universal adhe-sive has not been tested suitable for everyday clinical practice. Shortening applica-tion time lead to lower adhesion values. Further research is therefore required into new universal adhesives whose effectiveness is already apparent after shorter appli-cation time in order to accelerate the restorative process.