Die Haftfestigkeit eines universellen Adhäsives am Dentin im Vergleich und der Einfluss des Applikationsverfahrens

Ziel dieser Untersuchung war es, die Haftfestigkeit des neuen Adhäsivs ScotchbondTM Universal am Dentin zu beurteilen, sowie den Einfluss des Applikationsverfahrens und der sechsmonatigen Wasserlagerung zu untersuchen. Zur Beantwortung der Fragestellung wurden 36 kariesfreie Weisheitszähne mit K...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Schweitzer, Denice
Beteiligte: Frankenberger, Roland (Prof. Dr.) (BetreuerIn (Doktorarbeit))
Format: Dissertation
Sprache:Deutsch
Veröffentlicht: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2013
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:PDF-Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Aim of this study was to assess bond strength of the new adhesive Scotch-bondTM Universal (3M ESPE) to dentin, furthermore to analyze the influence of application mode and six months of water storage. To recieve the data 36 carees-free third molars were provided with class-I-cavities and subsequently applicated four different adhesives: The new ScotchbondTM Universal (3M ESPE) in Selective-Enamel-Etching- (ES) and in Etch-and-Rinse-mode (ET), iBond® SelfEtch (I) (Heraeus) OptiBondTM Solo Plus (O) (Kerr) and Syntac® Classic (Ivoclar Vivadent) in Selective-Enamel-Etching- (SS) and Etch-and-Rinse-mode (ST). Cavities were closed with hybrid resin FiltekTM Z250 (3M ESPE) and polymerised by FLASHlite 1401® (Discus Dental). From every group one half of teeth (n=3) were sectioned into sticks and stored in water for six months (--2). The other half was directly processed (--1). Bond strength of these specimens was recorded in microtensile testing machine (calibration: distance < 5mm, speed 1mm/min, maximum force 50 N) and afterwards the breaking surface was measured. Statistical analysis was done by Shapiro-Wilk-test (p=0,001), Kruskal-Wallis-test (p<0,001) and multip-le Dunn-tests (p<0,05). Results: the new adhesive ScotchbondTM Universal achieved in both application modes comparably bonding strength (ES1: 18,6 +/- 9,7 MPa; ET1: 22,7 +/- 7,1 MPa) to the other bonding systems (I1: 16,7 +/- 5,6 MPa; O1: 21,8 +/- 7,8 MPa; SS1: 17,2 +/- 8,4 MPa; ST1: 19,1 +/- 9,4 MPa). The use of Etch-and-Rinse-mode yields with ScotchbondTM Universal in 20% improvement of bond strength in immediate measuring (ES1: 18,6 +/- 9,7 MPa → ET1: 22,7 +/- 7,1 MPa). After six months of water storage there is no difference detectable anymore (ES2: 22,4 +/- 4,9 MPa → ET2: 23,0 +/- 9,1 MPa). The six months of water storage reduce bond strength of OptibondTM Solo Plus to 86% and Syntac® Classic to 82% in Selective-Enamel-Etch-mode and to 59% in Etch-and-Rinse-mode. Water storage has less influence to bond strength of iBond® SelfEtch (95%) and Scotchbond TM Universal (ES1: 18,6 +/- 9,7 MPa → ES2: 22,4 +/- 4,9 MPa = 120%, ET1: 22,7 +/- 7,1 MPa → ET2: 23,0 +/- 9,1 MPa = 101%). Finally the following results need to be mentioned: • The bond strength of ScotchbondTM Universal to dentin in comparison to the ashesives iBond® SE, OptiBondTM Solo Plus und Syntac® Classic is encouraging. • The use of Etch-and-Rinse-mode does not improve significantly the ad-hesion of ScotchbondTM Universal. • The water storage for six months does not have a negative influence on bond strength of Scotchbond® Universal.