Motivate the Crowd or Crowd-them out? The Impact of Local Government spending on the Voluntary Provision of a Green Public Good

Cities are increasingly hold accountable for climate action. By demonstrating their pro-environmentality through own climate-related activities, they not at least aspire to encourage individual climate protection efforts. Based on standard economic theory there is little reason to assume that this i...

תיאור מלא

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
הוצא לאור ב:MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 33-2022)
Autoren: Bartels, Lara, Kesternich, Martin
פורמט: Artikel
שפה:אנגלית
יצא לאור: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2022
נושאים:
גישה מקוונת:PDF-Volltext
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
תיאור
סיכום:Cities are increasingly hold accountable for climate action. By demonstrating their pro-environmentality through own climate-related activities, they not at least aspire to encourage individual climate protection efforts. Based on standard economic theory there is little reason to assume that this is a promising strategy. Financed by taxpayers’ money, cities’ contributions are considered as substitutes that crowd-out private contributions to the same public good. Inspired by research on providing information on reference group behavior, we challenge this argument and conduct a framed-field experiment to analyze the impact of reference group information on the voluntary provision of a green public good. We investigate whether information on previous contributions by fellow citizens or the city affect individual contributions. We do not find statistical evidence that city-level information crowds-out additional individual contributions. A reference to fellow citizens significantly increases the share of contributors as it attracts subjects that are not per-se pro-environmentally oriented.
תיאור פיזי:35 Seiten
ISSN:1867-3678
DOI:10.17192/es2024.0740