The (In)Validity of the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem—Findings from a Representative German Population Survey

In this paper, we utilise data from a German population survey to test the validity of the Ricardian equivalence theorem (RET). In 2013, 2,000 representatively chosen people were asked whether they have altered their consumption and saving behaviour in response to the significant increase in public...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
出版年:MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 11-2016)
主要な著者: Hayo, Bernd, Neumeier, Florian
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2016
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:PDFフルテキスト
タグ: タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
その他の書誌記述
要約:In this paper, we utilise data from a German population survey to test the validity of the Ricardian equivalence theorem (RET). In 2013, 2,000 representatively chosen people were asked whether they have altered their consumption and saving behaviour in response to the significant increase in public debt that occurred between 2008 and 2012. Our findings suggest that, in general, RET does not hold. Only 7% of our respondents state that they consume a smaller proportion of their income and save a larger proportion in response to public debt accumulation. Moreover, using multinominal logit regressions, we find that individuals’ consumption responses are significantly related to their economic situation, time preferences, education, and age.
物理的記述:23 Seiten
ISSN:1867-3678
DOI:10.17192/es2024.0491