Publikationsserver
Land allocation in subsistence economies and intra-familial time-use decisions
Classical household theory predicts that adolescents facing a developed labour market should invest in formal education. In contrast, it is obvious that adolescents in subsistence economies should choose learning-by-doing approaches to working on the family farm. However, it is unclear what determin...
Gespeichert in:
| 发表在: | MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 51-2014) |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | , , |
| 格式: | 文件 |
| 语言: | 英语 |
| 出版: |
Philipps-Universität Marburg
2014
|
| 主题: | |
| 在线阅读: | PDF-Volltext |
| 标签: |
添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
| 总结: | Classical household theory predicts that adolescents facing a developed labour market should invest in formal education. In contrast, it is obvious that adolescents in subsistence economies should choose learning-by-doing approaches to working on the family farm. However, it is unclear what determines optimal education choices among societies in transition from subsistence to labour-market integration. While education is generally the basic condition to enter the labour market, access to land represents an important asset in subsistence farming. This paper argues that intra-household time use and education { that is, time spent learning outside the family farm { is influenced by the way land is transferred from one generation to the next. We use a dichotomous approach assuming that land is either transferred by bequest or by a formal land board. These two methods represent the extremes of a scale that considers personal relations and reliance on certified abilities as the basis for land allocation. This paper provides a theoretical analysis of how anticipated bequests and asset transfers from other sources influence trade-offs between work on the family farm and other time-use options. We discuss the effects using a case study from the Okavango. |
|---|---|
| 实物描述: | 41 Seiten |
| ISSN: | 1867-3678 |
| DOI: | 10.17192/es2024.0351 |