Aid Withdrawal as Punishment for Defaulting Sovereigns? An Empirical Analysis
This paper empirically investigates whether donor countries punish sovereign defaults by reducing foreign aid ows. Our findings reject the hypothesis formulated in the theoretical literature that a default leads to a loss of foreign aid for the defaulting country. Creditor countries directly aff...
Gardado en:
Publicado en: | MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 20-2012) |
---|---|
Autoren: | , |
Formato: | Arbeit |
Idioma: | inglés |
Publicado: |
Philipps-Universität Marburg
2012
|
Schlagworte: | |
Acceso en liña: | Texto completo PDF |
Tags: |
Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper empirically investigates whether donor countries punish sovereign
defaults by reducing foreign aid
ows. Our findings reject the hypothesis formulated in the theoretical literature that a default leads to a loss of foreign
aid for the defaulting country. Creditor countries directly affected by the
default do not reduce their aid disbursements. Hence, foreign aid is not used
as a punishment instrument. Neither can it therefore serve as an enforce-
ment mechanism for international debt contracts. Furthermore, other donors
even raise the amount of development assistance allocated to the delinquent
country by about 15% on average. Overall the amount of foreign aid given
to the defaulting country increases by 6.4%. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1867-3678 |
DOI: | 10.17192/es2024.0134 |