The Relevance of Judicial Procedure for Economic Growth

It has been argued that procedural formalism undermines economic efficiency by fostering rent-seeking and corruption. We challenge this view by arguing that a number of judicial procedures foster economic growth by increasing the predictability of court decisions, which leads to more transactions...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

সংরক্ষণ করুন:
গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রকাশিত:MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 28-2008)
প্রধান লেখক: Hayo, Bernd, Voigt, Stefan
বিন্যাস: Arbeit
ভাষা:ইংরেজি
প্রকাশিত: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2008
বিষয়গুলি:
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:পিডিএফ এ সম্পূর্ন পাঠ
ট্যাগগুলো: ট্যাগ যুক্ত করুন
কোনো ট্যাগ নেই, প্রথমজন হিসাবে ট্যাগ করুন!
বিবরন
সংক্ষিপ্ত:It has been argued that procedural formalism undermines economic efficiency by fostering rent-seeking and corruption. We challenge this view by arguing that a number of judicial procedures foster economic growth by increasing the predictability of court decisions, which leads to more transactions and higher investment levels. We investigate the effects on economic growth of 15 judicial procedures. Employing a standard growth model, we find in a cross-section of 67 countries that timeliness, written—as opposed to oral—procedures, and the right to counsel have a positive effect on growth, whereas the number of independent procedural actions as well as the presumption of innocence have negative effects. Our results partially contradict the results of former studies based on the Lex Mundi dataset.
আইএসএসএন:1867-3678
ডিওআই:10.17192/es2023.0214