Publikationsserver
Power over Prosecutors Corrupts Politicians: Cross Country Evidence Using a New Indicator
It is hypothesized that prosecution agencies that are dependent on the executive have less incentives to prosecute crimes committed by government members which, in turn, increases their incentives to commit such crimes. Here, this hypothesis is put to an empirical test focusing on a particular k...
I tiakina i:
| I whakaputaina i: | MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 01-2008) |
|---|---|
| Ngā kaituhi matua: | , , |
| Hōputu: | Tuhinga |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
Philipps-Universität Marburg
2008
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | Kuputuhi katoa PDF |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Whakarāpopototanga: | It is hypothesized that prosecution agencies that are dependent on the executive
have less incentives to prosecute crimes committed by government
members which, in turn, increases their incentives to commit such crimes.
Here, this hypothesis is put to an empirical test focusing on a particular
kind of crime, namely corruption. In order to test it, it was necessary to
create an indicator measuring de jure as well as de facto independence of
the prosecution agencies. The regressions show that de facto independence
of prosecution agencies robustly reduces corruption of officials. |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.17192/es2023.0188 |