Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs...

תיאור מלא

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
Autoren: Oberkircher, Ludwig, Riemenschneider, Julia, Bäumlein, Martin, Knauf, Tom, Bliemel, Christopher, Ruchholtz, Steffen, Krüger, Antonio
פורמט: Artikel
שפה:אנגלית
יצא לאור: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2022
נושאים:
spine
luxation
fracture
biomechanical
Medizin
lateral mass screw
cervical
pedicle screw
Medical sciences Medicine
גישה מקוונת:PDF-Volltext
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
תיאור
סיכום:In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs cervical pedicle screws (CPS)) in the subaxial cervical spine regarding primary stability in a biomechanical testing using a translational injury model.
תאור פריט:Gefördert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der UB Marburg.
תיאור פיזי:5 Seiten
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028866

פריטים דומים