Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs...

Täydet tiedot

Tallennettuna:
Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijät: Oberkircher, Ludwig, Riemenschneider, Julia, Bäumlein, Martin, Knauf, Tom, Bliemel, Christopher, Ruchholtz, Steffen, Krüger, Antonio
Aineistotyyppi: Artikkeli
Kieli:englanti
Julkaistu: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2022
Aiheet:
spine
luxation
fracture
biomechanical
Medizin
lateral mass screw
cervical
pedicle screw
Medical sciences Medicine
Linkit:PDF-kokoteksti
Tagit: Lisää tagi
Ei tageja, Lisää ensimmäinen tagi!
Kuvaus
Yhteenveto:In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs cervical pedicle screws (CPS)) in the subaxial cervical spine regarding primary stability in a biomechanical testing using a translational injury model.
Huomautukset:Gefördert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der UB Marburg.
Ulkoasu:5 Seiten
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028866

Samankaltaisia teoksia