Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oberkircher, Ludwig, Riemenschneider, Julia, Bäumlein, Martin, Knauf, Tom, Bliemel, Christopher, Ruchholtz, Steffen, Krüger, Antonio
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Texto Completo PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs cervical pedicle screws (CPS)) in the subaxial cervical spine regarding primary stability in a biomechanical testing using a translational injury model.
Notas:Gefördert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der UB Marburg.
Descripción Física:5 Seiten
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028866