Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation
In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs...
محفوظ في:
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
التنسيق: | مقال |
اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
منشور في: |
Philipps-Universität Marburg
2022
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | PDF النص الكامل |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
الملخص: | In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs cervical pedicle screws (CPS)) in the subaxial cervical spine regarding primary stability in a biomechanical testing using a translational injury model. |
---|---|
وصف المادة: | Gefördert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der UB Marburg. |
وصف مادي: | 5 Seiten |
DOI: | 10.1097/MD.0000000000028866 |