Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Oberkircher, Ludwig, Riemenschneider, Julia, Bäumlein, Martin, Knauf, Tom, Bliemel, Christopher, Ruchholtz, Steffen, Krüger, Antonio
Формат: Статья
Язык:английский
Опубликовано: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2022
Предметы:
spine
luxation
fracture
biomechanical
Medizin
lateral mass screw
cervical
pedicle screw
Medical sciences Medicine
Online-ссылка:PDF-полный текст
Метки: Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
Описание
Итог:In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs cervical pedicle screws (CPS)) in the subaxial cervical spine regarding primary stability in a biomechanical testing using a translational injury model.
Примечание:Gefördert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der UB Marburg.
Объем:5 Seiten
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028866

Схожие документы