Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs...

Whakaahuatanga katoa

I tiakina i:
Ngā taipitopito rārangi puna kōrero
Ngā kaituhi matua: Oberkircher, Ludwig, Riemenschneider, Julia, Bäumlein, Martin, Knauf, Tom, Bliemel, Christopher, Ruchholtz, Steffen, Krüger, Antonio
Hōputu: Tuhinga
Reo:Ingarihi
I whakaputaina: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2022
Ngā marau:
Urunga tuihono:Kuputuhi katoa PDF
Tags: Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Whakaahuatanga
Whakarāpopototanga:In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs cervical pedicle screws (CPS)) in the subaxial cervical spine regarding primary stability in a biomechanical testing using a translational injury model.
Whakaahutanga tūemi:Gefördert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der UB Marburg.
Whakaahuatanga ōkiko:5 Seiten
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028866