Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation

In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs...

Fuld beskrivelse

Gespeichert in:
Bibliografiske detaljer
Autoren: Oberkircher, Ludwig, Riemenschneider, Julia, Bäumlein, Martin, Knauf, Tom, Bliemel, Christopher, Ruchholtz, Steffen, Krüger, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprog:engelsk
Udgivet: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2022
Fag:
spine
luxation
fracture
biomechanical
Medizin
lateral mass screw
cervical
pedicle screw
Medical sciences Medicine
Online adgang:PDF-Volltext
Tags: Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
Beskrivelse
Summary:In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs cervical pedicle screws (CPS)) in the subaxial cervical spine regarding primary stability in a biomechanical testing using a translational injury model.
Emne beskrivelse:Gefördert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der UB Marburg.
Fysisk beskrivelse:5 Seiten
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028866

Lignende værker