Shifting Epistemologies in Area Studies: From Space to Scale

Area studies suffer from various epistemic borderlines which have been drawn and grown during decades of constructing a 'world order' that is ultimately defined by political power relations. The question of what constitutes am 'area' or a 'region' is a timely and contes...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Zapisane w:
Opis bibliograficzny
Wydane w:Middle East - Topics & Arguments
1. autor: Derichs, Claudia
Format: Daten Artikel (Zeitschrift)
Język:
angielski
Wydane: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2015
Hasła przedmiotowe:
Dostęp online:Dostęp online
Zobacz zapis
Etykiety: Dodaj etykietę
Nie ma etykietki, Dołącz pierwszą etykiete!
Opis
Streszczenie:Area studies suffer from various epistemic borderlines which have been drawn and grown during decades of constructing a 'world order' that is ultimately defined by political power relations. The question of what constitutes am 'area' or a 'region' is a timely and contested one. Moreover, epistemic borderlines have been constructed by a hegemonic way of identifying academic disciplines. The separation between area studies and disciplines, too, is a decision based on global epistemic power relations. The following paragraphs address the constructivist dimension of area studies and disciplines. The main argument is that area studies and disciplines are in no way bound to geographical settings but derive from a politically-informed defining and 'scaling' of localities, ethnicities, languages, religions, and cultures.
DOI:10.17192/meta.2015.4.2981