Titel:Citizens’ perceptions of justice in international climate policy – An empirical analysis
Autor:Schleich, Joachim
Weitere Verfasser:Dütschke, Elisabeth; Schwirplies, Claudia; Ziegler, Andreas
Veröffentlicht:2014
URI:https://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/es/2024/0312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17192/es2024.0312
URN: urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-es2024-03129
ISSN: 1867-3678
DDC:330 Wirtschaft
Publikationsdatum:2024-01-12
Lizenz:https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0

Dokument

Schlagwörter:
justice, equity, climate change, distributive justice;, Climate change policies, burden sharing

Summary:
Relying on a recent survey of more than 3300 participants from China, Germany and the US, this paper empirically analyzes citizens’ perceptions of climate change and climate policy, focusing on key guiding principles for sharing mitigation costs across countries. The ranking of the main principles for burden-sharing is identical in China, Germany and the US: accountability followed by capability, egalitarianism, and sover-eignty. Thus, on a general level, citizens across these countries seem to have a com-mon understanding of fairness. We therefore find no evidence that citizens’ (stated) fairness preferences are detrimental to future burden-sharing agreements. While there is heterogeneity in citizens’ perceptions of climate change and climate policy within and across countries, a substantial portion of citizens in all countries perceive a lack of transparency, fairness, and trust in international climate agreements.


* Das Dokument ist im Internet frei zugänglich - Hinweise zu den Nutzungsrechten