Dokument

Summary:
The aim of this thesis was to study the ecology, genetics and evolution of two congeneric species with different fragmentation histories. Saxifraga sponhemica is a glacial relict species of long-term fragmented lowland rock and scree habitats, and has been naturally rare for thousands of years with a disjunct distribution in Central Europe. Saxifraga granulata is a formerly common species of species-rich semi-natural grasslands that has become recently fragmented due to the intensification of agricultural practices. Fragmentation generally leads to loss of genetic diversity due to drift and inbreeding, reduced mean fitness and increased extinction rates of populations. Formerly common species are expected to be particularly susceptible to the recent anthropogenic fragmentation of their habitats. An analysis of the genetic diversity and the genetic structure of S. sponhemica populations based on RAPD-markers showed that in most populations considerable genetic variability has been preserved. An isolation by distance pattern of genetic differentiation suggested historical gene flow during the last glaciation when suitable habitats were much more abundant. Long-lived plant species can thus maintain historic genetic patterns despite the small size and strong isolation of populations. We grew plants form several families per population in a common garden to study the quantitative genetic variation within and among populations. We found several lines of evidence for divergent selection. Most population trait means were significantly related to climate gradients, indicating adaptation. Quantitative genetic differentiation increased with climatic distance and with geographical distance, even when neutral molecular divergence was controlled for, and quantitative genetic differentiation (QST) exceeded molecular genetic differentiation (FST) for some traits. Traits under strong selection showed little genetic variation within populations. The evolutionary potential of a population was not related to its size, the performance of the population or its neutral genetic diversity. However, performance in the common garden was lower for plants from populations with reduced molecular genetic variation, suggesting inbreeding depression due to genetic erosion. Studies of molecular and quantitative genetic variation may thus provide complementary insights important for the conservation of rare species. S. sponhemica does not appear to be genetically threatened in the short term, but populations are threatened by habitat destruction. A conservation measure could be to create new populations in suitable habitats with seeds from the same region to avoid local maladaptation. We also studied the RAPD molecular and the quantitative genetic structure of 19 populations of the declining grassland plant S. granulata in a geographically restricted area in Luxembourg and Germany. Differentiation for quantitative traits (QST) was slightly lower than differentiation for molecular markers (FST) suggesting homogenising selection for optimal trait values. Contrary to our expectations, the level of differentiation among fragmented S. granulata populations was low, and molecular genetic diversity was high and was not correlated with the size or the mean plant performance of populations. Gene flow by long distance dispersal or the longevity, clonality and polyploidy of S.granulata may have prevented genetic erosion due to drift. To avoid genetic erosion in the future, extant populations should be preserved and gene flow among populations should be maintained. Habitat fragmentation has led to increased inbreeding and inbreeding depression in many species. We investigated the effects of increased inbreeding and of intra- and interpopulation crosses on the reproduction and performance of S. granulata. Between population crosses may result in increased performance (heterosis), but may also lead to the disruption of coadapted gene complexes and to decreased performance (outbreeding depression). Inbreeding depression affected all traits in the F1 generation, but was stronger for traits expressed late during development and varied among families. Multiplicative fitness of the F2 generation after serial inbreeding was extremely low, but there was heterosis after crossing inbred lines. Outbreeding depression was however not observed in the F2. We also subjected the first generation of offspring to a fertilization and stress treatments (competition and defoliation). The adaptive plasticity of offspring from selfing and from interpopulation crosses in response to nutrient addition was reduced. Outbreeding depression was also observed in response to stress. The results suggest that continuous inbreeding may drastically reduce the fitness of plants, but effects may be environment-dependent. Overall, the results of this thesis advance knowledge on the role of time since habitat fragmentation, of historic connectivity among populations, and of life history traits such as longevity and clonality on the processes of selection and drift that shape the genetic variation within and among populations. It stresses the importance of using both molecular and quantitative genetic tools to gain complementary insight for the conservation of rare and endangered plant species. It shows how knowledge about the vulnerability to increased inbreeding and the potential risks of artificially increasing gene flow between populations of recently fragmented species contributes to their effective conservation.

Bibliographie / References

1. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163,688
2. Schlichting CD, Levin DA (1986) Effects of inbreeding on phenotypic plasticity in culti- vated Phlox. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 72, 114-119.
3. Stevens DP, Richards AJ (1985) Gynodioecy in Saxifraga granulata L. (Saxifragaceae).
4. Walisch TJ, Matthies D, Hermant S, Colling G (2015a) Genetic structure of Saxifraga rosacea subsp. sponhemica, a rare endemic rock plant of Central Europe. Plant Sys- tematics and Evolution, 301, 251-263.
5. Saunders DA (1991) Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review. Conservation biology, 5(1), 18 -32.
6. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat frag- mentation for plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 413-418.
7. Smidova A, Munzbergova Z, Plackova I (2011) Genetic diversity of a relict plant species, Ligularia sibirica (L.) Cass. (Asteraceae). Flora, 206,151-157.
8. Young AG, Brown AHD, Murray BG, Thrall PH, Miller C (2000) Genetic erosion, re- stricted mating and reduced viability in fragmented populations of the endangered grassland herb Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides. Pages 335-359 in Young AG, Clarke GM, editors. Genetics, demography and viability of fragmented populations. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Van Treuren R, Bijlsma R, Van Delden W, Ouborg NJ (1991) The significance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction. 1. Genetic differentiation in Salvia pratensis and Scabiosa columbaria in relation to population size. Heredity, 66, 181-189.
10. Widén B, Andersson S (1993) Quantitative genetics of life-history and morphology in a rare plant, Senecio integrifolius. Heredity, 70, 503-514.
11. Thiele J, Hansen T, Siegismund HR, Hauser TP (2010) Genetic variation of inbreeding depression among floral and fitness traits in Silene nutans. Heredity, 104, 52-60.
12. Visscher PM, Hill GW, Wray NR (2008) Heritability in the genomics era -concepts and misconceptions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 255-266.
13. Whitlock MC, McCauley DE (1999) Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: F ST not equal 1/(4Nm+1). Heredity, 82, 117-125.
14. Stehlik I, Schneller JJ, Bachmann K (2002) Immigration and in situ glacial survival of the low-alpine Erinus alpinus (Scrophulariaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 77, 87-103.
15. RefeRences Tollefsrud MM, Bachmann K, Jakobsen KS, Brochmann C (1998) Glacial survival does not matter -II: RAPD phylogeography of Nordic Saxifraga cespitosa. Molecular Ecology, 7(9), 1217 -1232.
16. Walisch TJ, Colling G, Bodenseh M, Matthies D (2015b) Divergent selection along cli- matic gradients in a rare central European endemic species, Saxifraga sponhemica. Annals of Botany, 115(7), 1177-1190.
17. Watkinson AR, White J (1986) Some life-history consequences of modular construction in plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B ,313, 31-51.
18. Stevens DP (1988) On the gynodioecious polymorphism in Saxifraga granulata L. (Sax- ifragaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 35, 15-28.
19. Whitlock MC (2008) Evolutionary inference from Q ST . Molecular Ecology, 17, 1885- 1896.
20. Waser NM, Price MV (1991) Outcrossing distance effects in Delphinium nelsonii: Pollen loads, pollen tubes, and seed set. Ecology, 72, 171-179.
21. Sih A, Baltus MS (1987) Patch size, pollinator behavior, and pollinator limitation in cat- nip. Ecology, 68, 1679-1690.
22. Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH, Goodwillie C, Parker IM, Bishop JG (1994) Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants.
23. Schoen DJ (1983) Relative fitnesses of selfed and outcrossed progeny in Gilia achilleifo- lia (Polemoniaceae). Evolution, 37, 292-301.
24. Schemske DW, Horvitz CC (1989) Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. Evolution, 43, 461-465.
25. Waser NM, Price MV (1989) Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution, 43, 1097-1109.
26. Willis JH (1993) Effects of different levels of inbreeding on fitness components in Mim- ulus guttatus. Evolution, 47, 864-876.
27. Wagner V, Durka W, Hensen I (2011) Increased genetic differentiation but no reduced genetic diversity in peripheral vs. Central populations of a steppe grass. American Journal of Botany, 98, 1173-1179.
28. Walisch TJ, Poncelet M, Colling G and Matthies D (2012) Effects of inbreeding and interpopulational crosses on performance and plasticity of two generations of a de- clining grassland plant. American Journal of Botany, 99 (8) 1300-1313.
29. Sozen E, Ozaydin B (2010) A study of genetic variation in endemic plant Centaurea wie- demanniana by using RAPD Markers. Ekoloji, 19, 1-8
30. Siepielsky AM, Dibattista JD, Carlson SM (2009) It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. Ecology Letters, 12, 1261-1276.
31. Scheepens JF, Stöcklin J, Pluess AR (2010a) Unifying selection acts on competitive abil- ity and relative growth rate in Scabiosa columbaria. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 612-618.
32. Scheepens JF, Frei ES, Stöcklin J (2010b) Genotypic and environmental variation in spe- cific leaf area in a widespread alpine plant after transplantation to different altitudes. Oecologia, 164, 141-150.
33. Vekemans X, Hardy OJ (2004) New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Molecular Ecology, 13, 921-935.
34. Vergeer P, Sonderen E, Ouborg NJ (2004) Introduction strategies put to the test: local adaptation versus heterosis. Conservation Biology, 18, 812-821.
35. Weber A, Kolb A (2014) Differences in heritable variation among populations of varying size in the perennial herb Phyteuma spicatum. Conservation Genetics, 15, 1329-1337.
36. Schnittler M, Günther K-F (1999) Central European vascular plants requiring priority conservation measures -an analysis from national Red Lists and distribution maps. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 891-925.
37. Van Rossum F, Campos De Sousa S, Triest L (2004) Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in an agricultural landscape on the common Primula veris, and com- parison with its rare congener, P. vulgaris. Conservation Genetics, 5, 231-245
38. Schaal BA, Leverich WJ, Rogstad SH (1991) A comparison of methods for assessing ge- netic variation in plant conservation biology. Pages 123-134 in Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York.
39. Vekemans X (2002) AFLP-SURV version 1.0. Distributed by the author. Laboratoire de Génétique et Ecologie Végétale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
40. Walter H, Straka H (eds) (1970) Arealkunde: Floristisch-historische Geobotanik. Einfüh- rung in die Phytologie, Vol 2. Ulmer, Stuttgart
41. Thorn K (1960) Bemerkungen zur Übersichtskarte vermutlicher Glazialreliktpflanzen Deutschlands. Mitteilungen der Floristisch-Soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft, 8, 81-85.
42. Uyenoyama MK, Holsinger KE, Waller DM (1993). Ecological and genetic factors di- recting the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 9, 327-381.
43. RefeRences Soltis PS, Soltis DE (1991) Genetic variation in endemic and widespread plant species: examples from Saxifragaceae and Polystichum (Dryopteridaceae). Aliso, 13, 215-223.
44. Tang M, Yu F-H, Jin X-B, Ge S (2010) High genetic diversity in the naturally rare plant Taihangia rupestris Yü et Li (Rosaceae) dwelling only cliff faces. Polish Journal of Ecology, 58, 241-248.
45. Schultz ST, Willis JH (1995) Individual variation in inbreeding depression -the roles of inbreeding history and mutation. Genetics, 141, 1209-1223.
46. Vitt P, Havens K (2004) Integrating quantitative genetics into ex situ conservation and restoration practices. Pages 286-304 in Guerrant EO, Havens K, Maunder M, editors. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival. Island Press, Washington DC. RefeRences Volis S, Yakubov B, Shulgina I, Ward D, Mendlinger S (2005) Distinguishing adaptive from nonadaptive genetic differentiation: comparison of Q ST and F ST at two spatial scales. Heredity, 95, 466-475.
47. Spitze K (1993) Population structure in Daphnia obtusa -quantitative genetic and allozy- mic variation. Genetics, 135, 367-374.
48. Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine SM, Walters SM, Webb DA (1968) Rosaceae to Umbelliferae, Vol 2. Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49. Stroh PA (2015) Saxifraga granulata L. Meadow Saxifrage. Species Account. Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland.
50. Webb DA, Gornall RJ (1989) Saxifrages of Europe. Christopher Helm, London.
51. Weber HE (1995), editor. Spermatophyta: Angiospermae: Dicotyledones. Band IV (2A) in Hegi G, author, Conert HJ, Jäger EJ, Kadereit JW, Schultze-Motel W, Wagenitz G, Weber HE, editors. Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Blackwell Wissenschafts- verlag, Berlin.
52. Widén B, Andersson S, Rao GY, Widen M (2002) Population divergence of genetic (co) variance matrices in a subdivided plant species, Brassica cretica. Journal of Evolu- tionary Biology, 15, 961-970.
53. Widén B, Cronberg N, Widén M (1994) Genotypic diversity, molecular markers and spa- tial distribution of genets in clonal plants, a literature survey. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica, 29, 245-263.
54. Zawko G, Krauss SL, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K (2001) Conservation genetics of the rare and endangered Leucopogon obtectus (Ericaceae). Molecular Ecology, 10, 2389-2396.
55. Steinger T, Haldimann P, Leiss KA, Müller-Schärer H (2002) Does natural selection pro- mote population divergence? A comparative analysis of population structure using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers and quantitative traits. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2583-2590.
56. Wagenius S, Hangelbroek HH, Ridley CE, Shaw RG (2010) Biparental inbreeding and interremnant mating in a perennial prairie plant: fitness consequences for progeny in their first eight years. Evolution, 64, 761-771.
57. Strasburg JL, Sherman NA, Wright KM, Moyle LC, Willis JH, Rieseberg LH (2012) What can patterns of differentiation across plant genomes tell us about adaptation and speciation? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 364-373.
58. Yuan N, Comes HP, Mao YR, Qi XS, Qiu YX (2012) Genetic effects of recent habitat fragmentation in the Thousand-Island Lake region of southeast China on the distylous herb Hedyotis chrysotricha (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 99, 1715-1725.
59. Waser NM, Price MV (1994) Crossing-distance effects in Delphinium nelsonii: outbreed- ing and inbreeding depression in progeny fitness. Evolution, 48, 842-852.
60. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 37, 433-458.
61. Waldmann P, Andersson S (1998) Comparison of quantitative genetic variation and allo- zyme diversity within and between populations of Scabiosa canescens and S. colum- baria. Heredity, 81, 79-86.
62. Ye Q, Tang F, Wei N, Yao X (2013) Molecular and quantitative trait variation within and among small fragmented populations of the endangered plant species Psilopeganum sinense. Annals of Botany, 113, 79-86.
63. Yang RC, Yeh FC, Yanchuk AD (1996) A comparison of isozyme and quantitative genetic variation in Pinus contorta ssp latifolia by F ST . Genetics, 142, 1045-1052.
64. Willis JH (1999) Inbreeding load, average dominance and the mutation rate for mildly deleterious alleles in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics, 153, 1885-1898.
65. Vasemägi A (2006) The adaptive hypothesis of clinal variation revisited: single-locus clines as a result of spatially restricted gene flow. Genetics, 173, 2411-2414.
66. Willi Y, Van Kleunen M, Dietrich S, Fischer M (2007) Genetic rescue persists beyond first-generation outbreeding in small populations of a rare plant. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 274, 2357-2364.
67. Van der Meer S, Van Houdt JKJ, Maes GE, Hellemans B, Jacquemyn H (2014) Microsat- ellite primers for the gynodioecious grassland perennial Saxifraga granulata (Saxi- fragaceae). Applications in Plant Sciences, 2(9).
68. Van der Meer S, Jacquemyn H (2015) Genetic diversity and spatial genetic structure of the grassland perennial Saxifraga granulata along Two River Systems. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 15 pages.
69. Storfer A (1999) Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited. Bio- logical Conservation, 87, 173-180.
70. RefeRences Yoshida Y, Honjo M, Kitamoto N, Ohsawa R (2008) Genetic variation and differentiation of floral morphology in wild Primula sieboldii evaluated by image analysis data and SSR markers. Breeding Science, 58, 301-307.

Das Dokument ist im Internet frei zugänglich - Hinweise zu den Nutzungsrechten