Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Marburg

Titel: The transmission of monetary policy in the Lao People´s Democratic Republic
Autor: Savannarideth, Vimaly
Weitere Beteiligte: Hayo, Bernd (Prof.Dr.)
Veröffentlicht: 2015
URN: urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-z2015-04153
DDC: Wirtschaft
Titel(trans.): Die Transmission von Geldpolitik in der Demokratischen Volksrepublik Laos
Publikationsdatum: 2015-12-16


Granger-causality, demand for money, Granger-Kausalität, Lao, Zinsfuß, Inflation, interest rate, Laos, money-output, Geldpolitik, Geldnachfrage

The empirical results add to the literature on monetary policy in Laos with five important findings, which are: i) based on log-­levels estimation, we find that money Granger-­causes output, which lends support to the proposition that the BoL is likely to be successful in stabilizing the business cycle; ii) the investigation of the money demand function provides strong evidence that the demand function in Laos is stable which implies that the BoL is likely to be successful in controlling inflation by managing the money supply; iii) the results of the impulse response analysis find that the responses of retail interest rates to a change in the policy rate are very small, which suggest that the likelihood of the BoL using the interest rate channel to achieve the desired impact on real economy and inflation is limited at this time; iv) the investigation of inflation determinants suggests that real GDP, money supply and the exchange rate are important factors in explaining the price level in the long-­run and in particular, the money variable is significant in both the long and the short-­run, this supports the proposition that the BoL is likely to be successful in controlling inflation through the management of money supply; and lastly, v) the analysis using a monetary model of the exchange rate does not appear to be very useful in explaining the fundamental forces that drive the exchange rate between the Lao Kip and U.S. dollar. Based on some of the findings, it is encouraging to know that through monetary policy, the central bank, if it chooses to, may be successful in stabilizing the business cycle and controlling inflation. This would support the government’s objective of achieving a target output growth of 8 percent and inflation to be under 2 digits. This further emphasizes the importance of monetary policy in the management of Laos’ economic environment.

Aufgrund einiger der Erkenntnisse ist es ermutigend zu wissen, dass die Zentralbank, sollte sie sich dafür entscheiden, durch Geldpolitik erfolgreich die Konjunktur stabilisieren und die Inflation steuern könnte. Dies würde der Regierung dabei helfen, das anvisierte Produktionswachstum von acht Prozent und einstellige Inflation zu erreichen. Dies betont nochmalig die Bedeutung von Geldpolitik in der Handhabung der Wirtschaft von Laos.

Bibliographie / References

  1. Lütkepohl, H. (1991). Introduction to time series analysis. Berlin: Springer- ‐Verlag.
  2. Hayo, B. (2000). The demand for money in Austria. Empirical Economics, 25(4), 581–603.
  3. Dornbusch, R. (1976). Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), 1161–76.
  4. Duck, N. W. (1993). Some international evidence on the quantity theory of money. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 25, 1- ‐12.
  5. Kerry, P. (2000). An introduction to applied econometrics in time series approach. New York: Palgrave.
  6. Sengsourivong, F. (2005). Dynamics of Inflation in Laos (Dissertation). The Australian National University Siliverstovs, B., & Bilan, O. (2005). Inflation dynamics in the transition economy of Ukraine. Eastern European Economics, 43(6), 66–81.
  7. International Monetary Fund (2000), Recovery from the Asian crisis and the role of the IMF. IMF publication.
  8. Wilson, I. (2009). The monetary approach to exchange rates: a brief review and empirical investigation of debt, deficit, and debt management: evidence from the United States. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 8(1), 83–99.
  9. References Adawo, M. A., & Effiong, E. L. (2013). Monetary exchange rate model as a long- ‐run phenomenon: evidence from Nigeria (Working paper). University of Uyo.
  10. Diouf, M. A. (2008). Modeling inflation for Mali (Working paper number 07/295). Retrieved from International Monetary Fund website.
  11. Goldfajn, I., & Werlang, S. R. da C. (2000). The pass- ‐through from depreciation to inflation: a panel study (Working paper number 5). Retrieved from Banco Central de Brasil.
  12. Kabundi, A. (2012). Dynamics of inflation in Uganda (Working paper number 152). Retrieved from African Development Bank Group.
  13. Tawadros, G. B. (2001). The predictive power of the monetary model of exchange rate determination. Applied Financial Economics, 11(3), 279–86.
  14. Savannarideth, V. (2015). The demand for money in the Lao People's Democratic Republic: evidence from cointegration test (Dissertation). Philipps University Marburg, Department of Business and Economics.
  15. Cheung, Y. W., & Lai, K. S. (1993). Finite- ‐sample sizes of Johansen's likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 55(3), 313–28.
  16. Emerson, J. (2006). The quantity theory of money: evidence from the United States. Economics Bulletin, 5(2), 1–6.
  17. Durevall, D., & Sjö, B. (2012). The dynamics of inflation in Ethiopia and Kenya (Working paper number 151). Retrieved from African Development Bank Group website.
  18. Frankel, J. A. (1979). On the mark: a theory of floating exchange rates based on real interest differentials. American Economic Review, 69(4), 610–22.
  19. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co- ‐integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–76.
  20. Chow, G. C., & Lin, A. L. (1971). Best linear unbiased interpolation, distribution, and extrapolation of time series by related series. The review of Economics and Statistics, 372- ‐375.
  21. McNown, R., & Wallace, M. S. (1994). Cointegration tests of the monetary exchange rate model for three high- ‐inflation economies. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 26(3), 396–411.
  22. Lüutkepohl, H., Saikkonen, P. and Trenkler, C. (2001), Maximum eigenvalue versus trace tests for the cointegrating rank of a VAR process. The Econometrics Journal, 4, 287–310.
  23. Himarios, D. (1987). Devaluation, devaluation expectations and price dynamics. Economica, 54(215), 299–313.
  24. Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59(6), 1551–30.
  25. Frenkel, J. A. (1976). A monetary approach to exchange rate: doctrinal aspects and empirical evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 78(2), 147–71.
  26. Moser, G. G. (1995). The main determinants of inflation in Nigeria. IMF Staff Papers, 42(2), 270.
  27. Bahmani- ‐Oskooee, M., & Domaç, I. (2003). On the link between dollarisation and inflation: evidence from Turkey. Comparative Economic Studies, 45(3), 306–328.
  28. Mishra, P., Montiel, P. J., & Spilimbergo, A. (2012). Monetary transmission in low- ‐income countries: effectiveness and policy implications. IMF Economic Review, 60(2), 270- ‐302.
  29. Johansen, S. (1992). Testing weak exogeneity and the order of cointegration in UK money demand data. Journal of Policy Modeling, 14(3), 313–334.
  30. MacDonald, R., & Taylor, M. P. (1991). The monetary approach to the exchange rate: long- ‐run relationships and coefficient restrictions. Economics Letters, 37(2), 179–85.
  31. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics And Control, 12(2/3), 231–54.
  32. Somanath, V. S. (1986). Efficient exchange rate forecasts: lagged models better than the random walk. Journal of International Money and Finance, 5(2), 195–220.
  33. Finn, M. G. (1986). Forecasting the exchange rate: a monetary or random walk phenomenon? Journal of International Money and Finance, 5(2), 181–93.
  34. MacDonald, R., & Taylor, M. P. (1994b). The monetary model of the exchange rate: long- ‐run relationships, short- ‐run dynamics and how to beat a random walk. Journal of International Money and Finance, 13(3), 276–90.
  35. Johansen, S. (1992a). Cointegration in partial systems and the efficiency of single- ‐equation analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 52(3), 389–402.
  36. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1992). Testing structural hypotheses in a multivariate cointegration analysis of the PPP and the UIP for UK. Journal of Econometrics, 53, 211–44.
  37. Goujon, M. (2006). Fighting inflation in a dollarized economy: the case of Vietnam. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(3), 564–581.
  38. Cheung, Y. W., Chinn, M. D., & Pascual, A. G. (2005). Empirical exchange rate models of the nineties: are any fit to survive? Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(7), 1150–75.
  39. Catão, L. a. V., & Terrones, M. E. (2005). Fiscal deficits and inflation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(3), 529–554.
  40. Baharumshah, A. Z., Mohd, S. H., & Ahn, S. K. (2009). On the predictive power of monetary exchange rate model: the case of the Malaysian Ringgit- ‐US dollar rate. Applied Economics, 41(14), 1761–70.
  41. Reinton, H., & Ongena, S. (1999). Out- ‐of- ‐sample forecasting performance of single equation monetary exchange rate models in Norwegian currency markets. Applied Financial Economics, 9(6), 545–50.
  42. Chin, L., Azali, M., Yusop, Z. B., & Yusoff, M. B. (2007). The monetary model of exchange rate: evidence from the Philippines. Applied Economics Letters, 14(13), 993–7.

* Das Dokument ist im Internet frei zugänglich - Hinweise zu den Nutzungsrechten