Co-operative Entrepreneurs and Agribusiness Development, A Study Towards the Development of Agribusiness Co-operatives in Indonesia 2013 Baga, Lukman Mohammad Baga Lukman Mohammad Wutz English Wirtschaftswissenschaften SUMMARY This study aims to examine the extent to which entrepreneurial characters of co-operative leaders is related to the success of agribusiness co-operatives, so that the findings can be used to form strategies for developing agribusiness co-operatives. This general objective can be achieved through some of the following operational objectives, namely to: (1) analyze factors that influence the development of co-operatives to determine success levels of agribusiness co-operatives in Indonesia; (2) identify characteristics of co-operative entrepreneurs in successful agribusiness co-operatives; (3) evaluate the effectiveness of co-operative education and training (CET) programs in Indonesia; and (4) formulate strategies for developing co-operative entrepreneurs and agribusiness co-operatives in Indonesia. The research was conducted in thirty dairy co-operatives in the Provinces of West Java and East Java. The determination of dairy co-operatives as the object of study was done deliberately, because dairy co-operatives in Indonesia are established in one of two ways, either in the form of a KUD which is established by government policy (top-down approach) or in the form of a Non-KUD, which is established naturally by dairy farmers (bottom-up approach). Analyses were conducted on the performance of co-operatives in 2000, and on the growth of co-operative businesses over five years (1996-2000). The data collected were analyzed in terms of the business and organizational aspects of co-operatives. Research respondents included co-operative boards of directors (BOD), managers, employees, and members and non-members of co-operatives, coming to a total of 420 respondents. Two indices were made, one each for business and organizational variables. After this was done, both of these indexes were plotted to form quadrants, in which the thirty dairy co-operatives distributed themselves into four typologies. The best co-operatives were those in the typology of Quadrant-I, which had relatively better performance in both business and organizational aspects than those in the other typologies. There were ten co-operatives in Quadrant-1, four co-operatives in Quadrant-II, and ten and six co-operatives in Quadrant-III and IV, respectively. Additionally, the two indices were then processed into a single index called the Dairy Co-operative Development Index, which sorted the thirty sample co-operatives from best-to-worst performance. The performance of co-operative leaders was analyzed by comparing their performance among quadrants. A statistical test was used to determine whether the character of co-operative leaders was significantly different among quadrants, particularly between Quadrant-I and the other Quadrants. This study shows that co-operative leaders in Quadrant-I have traits frequently recognized as entrepreneurial traits, namely the highest score for internal locus of control and the need for achievement, an ideal graph form of social motives, as well as a moderate risk-taking attitude. To examine the third operational objective, the study observed the implementation of CET programs in Indonesia. The primary data was obtained from 58 co-operative lecturers from 32 universities throughout Indonesia and 206 students who were taking co-operative studies at four sampled universities. In addition to this, expert interviews were conducted with eight co-operative experts, using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The result showed that the implementation of CET programs in Indonesia was still not effective in supporting the development of co-operatives. In addition, a review of the implementation of co-operative education at universities showed that co-operative education was still not capable of motivating students to contribute to the development of co-operatives. The strategy proposed for developing CE consists of developing its three pillars, namely: (1) building understanding and confidence in co-operatives, (2) developing business and technological knowledge and skills, and (3) developing altruistic leadership skills. Meanwhile, the strategy for developing agribusiness co-operatives prioritizes the development of the existing agribusiness co-operatives, which is formulated while referring to the typology of co-operatives and Co-operative Development Index. application/pdf monograph Wutz https://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/diss/z2013/0479/cover.png Philipps-Universität Marburg Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Marburg Universitätsbibliothek Marburg https://doi.org/10.17192/z2013.0479 Max opus:5168 Economics Wirtschaft Die genossenschaftlichen Unternehmern und die Entwicklung des Agribusiness, eine Studie zur Entwicklung von Agribusiness Genossenschaft in Indonesien ths Prof. Dr. Kirk Michael Kirk, Michael (Prof. Dr.) 2013-10-28 Watson, J F and T E Copeland. 1986. Managerial Finance. CBS College Publishing. Porter, Michael E. 1980. Competitive Strategy, Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press. New York. Van der Krogt, Ferd and Ad A Vermulst. 2000. Beliefs about organizing learning: a conceptual and empirical analysis of managers and workers learning action theories. International Journal of Training and Development, 4:2. Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Oxford. Norton, George W and Jeffrey R Alwang. 1993. Introduction to Economics of Agricultural Development. McGraw-Hill. New York. Schwarz, Adam. 1994. A Nation in Waiting, Indonesia in the 1990s. Westview Press. Asian Development Outlook, 2001. Stoffregen, Heinz. 1994b. Pfeiffer, Eduard (1835-1921); in Dülfer Eberhard (Editor). 1994. International Handbook of Co-operative Organization. Vandenhoeck + Ruprecht. Göttingen. Konopnicki, M and G Vandewalle (Ed). 1978. Co-operation as an Instrument for Rural Development. University of Ghent. Belgium. Vilstrup, Richard H, David W Cobia and Robert Cropp. 1989. Adjustment by Existing Co-operatives; in Cobia David W (ed). 1989. Co-operatives in Agriculture. Prentice Hall. New Jersey. Saragih, Bungaran. 1998. Agribisnis: Paradigma Baru Pembangunan Ekonomi Pertanian. Yayasan Mulia Persada Indonesia-PT Surveyor Indonesia and Pusat Studi Pembangunan LP-IPB. Jakarta. Saragih, Bungaran. 2003. Agribisnis Sebagai Landasan Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia. Agrimedia, Vol.6 No.1. February 2003. MMA-IPB. Bogor. Wibowo, Drajad Hari and MHRS Ario Putra, 2000. Agribisnis Sebagai Soko Guru Perekonomian Daerah: Tantangan di Tengah Upaya Pemulihan Ekonomi dan Euforia Desentralisasi. Pengembangan Agribisnis Perkebunan Sebagai Basis Pertumbuhan Perekonomian Daerah. Agrimedia, Vol. 6 No.2, September 2000, p.10-15. Nilsson, Jerker, Kyriakos Kyriakopoulos, Gert van Dijk. 1997. Agricultural Co- operatives in the European Union, Current Challenges and Trends. Paper presented at the conference on " Rural Co-operatives in the Perspective of the Integration with the European Union " , December. Zakopane. Tampubolon, SMH. 2000. Arah Kebijakan/Program Diversifikasi Pangan dalam Mengurangi Ketergantungan pada Beras: Aspek Produksi/Suplai; dalam Wibowo Rudi. 2000. Pertanian dan Pangan; Bunga Rampai Pemikiran Menuju Ketahanan Pangan. Sinar Harapan. Jakarta. Aziz, Iwan Jaya. 1998. Asia's Economic Downturn; Prospect for Reform in Economics and Governance. The Asia Foundation. Taimni, Krishan K (Editors). 1988. Asias' Rural Co-operatives. Oxford + IBH Publishing Co. PVT. LTD. New Delhi. Atkinson, John W and Norman T Feather (Eds). 1974. A Theory of Achievement Motivation. Robert E Krieger Publishing Company, Hutington, New York. Susanto, Harry. 2002. Koperasi sebagai Mata Kuliah di Perguruan Tinggi, Bagaimana Kedudukannya? in LSP2I. 2002. Prosiding Seminar dan Lokakarya Standardisasi Pembelajaran Ekonomi Koperasi dalam Rangka Menumbuhkembangkan Jiwa Kewirakoperasian di Lingkungan PTN dan PTS Seluruh Indonesia. LSP2I-Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Airlangga- CCA. Surabaya. Sumodiwirjo, Teko. 1983. Beberapa Soal Sekitar Pak Tani dan Hubungannya dengan Gerakan Koperasi; in Swasono, Sri-Edi (Ed). 1983. Mencari Bentuk, Posisi dan Realitas Koperasi di Dalam Orde Ekonomi Indonesia. UI-Press. Jakarta. Nuhung, Iskandar Andi. 2006. Bedah Terapi Pertanian Nasional; Peran Strategies dan Revitalisasi. PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer. Jakarta. Abdulmanap, Soerowo. 1987. Benang Merah Ajaran dan Konsepsi Ekonomi Bung Hatta; in Swasono, Sri-Edi (Ed.). 1987. Sistem Ekonomi dan Demokrasi Ekonomi. UI Press. Jakarta. Watson, G H. 1993. Benchmarking, Vom Besten Lernen. Verlag Moderne Industrie. Landsberg. Aksi Agraris Kanisius. 1974. Beternak Sapi Perah. Penerbit Kanisius, Yogyakarta Alma, Buchari. 2001. Kewirausahaan. CV Alfabeta. Bandung. Raju, K V. 2004. Changing environment and dairy co-operative in India. In Trewin Ray (Ed). 2004. Co-operatives: Issues and trends in developing countries. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. Canberra. Porter, Michael E. 1985. Competitive Advantage, Creating and Sutaining Superior Performance. Free Press. Co-opeartion in Woeld Agriculture; Experiences, Problems and Perspectives. Food and Agriculture Policy Research Centre. Tokyo. Nakayasu, Sadako. 1985. Co-operative Organization in Agricultural Production in Japan; Overcomming Small-scale Farming, in; Bergmann and Ogura (Eds). Kuhn, Johannes. 1990. Co-operative Organizations for rural Development. Marburg Consult for Self-Help Promotion. Series A-4. Marburg. Trewin, Ray (Ed). 2004. Co-operatives: Issues and Trends in Developing Countries. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. Canberra. Taimni, Krishan K. 1996. Coopnet, Co-operative Training Series, Volume 1. Co- operative Branch, ILO, Geneva. Soewardi, Herman. 1997. Daman Pionir Koperasi Peternakan; in Syarief Abdullah. 1997. Membangun Usaha Koperasi Persusuan Mandiri: Pengalaman, Pemikiran dan Perjuangan Drh Haji Daman Danuwidjaja. KPBS Pangalengan. Sularso. 1997. Dampak Ekonomi Pasar dan Perjanjian Perdagangan Internasional Terhadap Perekonomian Nasional dan Sikap Koperasi Indonesia; in Soedjono Ibnoe, et.al. 1997. Koperasi di Tengah Arus Liberalisasi Ekonomi. Yayasan Formasi. Jakarta. Swasono, Sri-Edi. 2002. " Dapatkah koperasi menjadi pilar orde ekonomi Indonesia " ; in LSP2I. 2002. Prosiding Seminar dan Lokakarya Standardisasi Pembelajaran Ekonomi Koperasi dalam Rangka Menumbuhkembangkan Jiwa Kewirakoperasian di Lingkungan PTN dan PTS Seluruh Indonesia. LSP2I-Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Airlangga-CCA. Surabaya. Kuznets, Simon. 1964. Ecomomic Growth and the Contribution of Agriculture in Eicher, C.K. DAN Witt, L.W. (editor). 1964. Agriculture in Economic Development. McGrwa-Hill. New York. Wardhana, Ali. 1998. " Economic reform in Indonesia: the transation from resource dependence to industrial competitiveness " in Rowen, Henry S (Ed). 1998. Behind East Asian Growth; the political and social foundations of prosperity. Routledge. New York. Swoboda, Walter. 1994. Education and Training in Germany, Co-operative, Dülfer Eberhard. 1994 International Handbook of Co-operative Organizations. Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. Göttingen. Partomo, T.S and A. Soedjono. (2002). Ekonomi Skala Kecil/Menengah dan. Koperasi. Jakarta. Ghalia Indonesia. Kuratko, Donald F and Richard M Hodgetts. 1992. Entrepreneurship, A Contemporary Approach, 2 nd Edition. The Dryden Press. New York. Nafziger, E Wayne. 1986. Entrepreneurship, Equity, and Economic Development. JAIPress Inc. Connecticut. Nasution, Muslimin. 2002. Evaluasi Kinerja Koperasi, Metode Sistem Diagnosa. Bank Bukopin dan TPP-KUKM. Jakarta. Rasmussen, A E. 1975. Financial Management in Co-operative Enterprises. Co- operative College of Canada. Saskatchewan. Siagian, Salim. 1993. Gagasan tentang Materi Pelatihan Kewirausahaan Koperasi; in IKOPIN, 1993. Seminar Proceeding on Co-operative Entrepreneurship Education. Philipps University of Marburg – Konrad Adrenauer Stiftung – IKOPIN. Jatinangor. Kirk, Michael, Jost W Kramer adn Rolf Steding (Hrsg). 2000. Genossenschaften und Kooperation in einer sich wandelnden Welt; Festschrift für Prof. Dr. Hans-H Münkner zum 65. Geburtstag. LIT Verlag. Munster. Seuster, Horst. 1994a. Haas, Wilhelm (1839-1913); in Dülfer Eberhard (Editor). 1994. International Handbook of Co-operative Organization. Vandenhoeck + Ruprecht. Göttingen. LSP2I. 2002. Prosiding Seminar dan Lokakarya Standardisasi Pembelajaran Ekonomi Koperasi dalam Rangka Menumbuhkembangkan Jiwa Kewirakoperasian di Münkner, Hans-H. 1985. Co-operative Principles and Co-operative Law. Friedrich- Ebert-Stiftung. Bonn Münkner Hans-H. 1989. Co-operative Ideas, Principles and Practices. Institut für Kooperation in Entwicklungsländern. Marburg. Sumantri, Lily R H. 1997. Ibnoe Soedjono, Benteng Ideologi Koperasi; in Tjokrowinoto et.al. 1997. Membangun Koperasi Sepenuh Hati. LSP2I. Jakarta. Soedjono, Ibnoe. 2003. Instrumen-instrumen Pengembangan Koperasi. LSP2I. Jakarta. Pinchot, III Gifford. 1985. Intrapreneuring. Harper and Row. New York. Priatmono, Bambang. 2000. Introduction to AHP, Reanalysis on the Study of Relocation of the South Kalimantan Province Capital); in Lembaga Manajemen PPM. 2000. Proceeding of The Indonesian Symposium on The Analytic Hierarchy Process -INSAHP. Jakarta. O'connor, John. 2004. Issues in establishing agricultural co-operatives. In Trewin Ray (Ed). 2004. Co-operatives: Issues and trends in developing countries. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. Canberra. Soedjono, Ibnoe. 2000a. Jatidiri Koperasi dalam Era Globalisasi; in. Djohan and Krisnamurthi. Membangun Koperasi Pertanian Berbasis Anggota. LSP2I- Inkopdit-Yappika. Jakarta. Soedjono, Ibnoe. 2002. Jatidiri Koperasi, Pembentukan Koperasi Sebagai Alternatif dalam Ekonomi Pasar; in LSP2I. 2002. Prosiding Seminar dan Lokakarya Standardisasi Pembelajaran Ekonomi Koperasi dalam Rangka Menumbuhkembangkan Jiwa Kewirakoperasian di Lingkungan PTN dan PTS Seluruh Indonesia. LSP2I-Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Airlangga- CCA. Surabaya. Srinarni, Endah. 1997. Kajian Kinerja Koperasi Secara Nasional. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Departemen Koperasi dan Pembinaan Pengusaha Kecil. Jakarta. Krugman, Paul. 2001. Kembalinya Depresi Ekonomi. Penerbit ITB. Bandung. Siagian, Salim and Asfahani. 1995. Kewirausahaan Indonesia dengan Semangat 17-8- 1945. Puslatkop dan PK. Jakarta. Sumardjo. 2006. Kilas Balik Kiprah PSP IPB dalam Pembangunan di Indonesia, dalam Indarti Yoyoh (Ed). 2006. 22 Tahun Studi Pembangunan: Pengurangan Kemiskinan, Pembangunan Agribisnis dan Revitalisasi Pertanian. PSP3- IPB. Bogor. Sadjad, Sjamsoe'oed. 2003; Kinerja Pembaungan Pertanian Indonesia ; dari Kacamata Agribisns Benih. Agrimedia, Vol. 8 No.2, April 2003, p.26-28. Asmin. 2001. Konsep dan Metode Pembelajaran untuk Orang Dewasa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Edisi 34. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Soedjono, Ibnoe. 1997. Koperasi dan Pembangunan Nasional. PIP-DEKOPIN. Jakarta. Soedjono, Ibnoe, et.al. 1996. Koperasi di Tengah Arus Liberalisasi Ekonomi. Yayasan Formasi. Jakarta. Nasution, Muslimin. 1999. Koperasi: Konsepsi, Pemikiran dan Peluang Pembangunan Masa Depan Bangsa. Departemen Kehutanan dan Perkebunan RI. Jakarta. Swasono, Sri-Edi, 1989. " Koperasi Sebagai Sistem Ekonomi Indonesia: Tantangan dan Momentum " ; in DEKOPIN. 1989. Hasil Seminar Sehari tentang Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Koperasi di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta Swasono, Sri-Edi (Ed.). 1987. Sistem Ekonomi dan Demokrasi Ekonomi. UI Press. Jakarta. Sularso. 2000. Koperasi Unit Desa Upaya Mempertajam Pengertian Sebagai Koperasi Pertanian; in Djohan Djabaruddin and Bayu Krisnamurthi. 2000. Sjahrir. 1998. Krisi Ekonomi Menuju Reformasi Total. Yayasan Obor Indonesia dan Yayasan Padi dan Kapas. Jakarta. Swasono, Sri Edi. 1997. Krisis dan Potensi Ancaman Terhadap Ideologi Perkoperasian Indonesia; in Djohan, et.al. (Editors). 1997. Koperasi Indonesia Menghadapi Abad ke-21. DEKOPIN. Jakarta. Tambunan, Tulus. 1998. Krisis Ekonomi dan Masa Depan Reformasi. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta. Suwandi, Ima. 1986. KUD Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Pedesaan. KOPINFO. Jakarta. Subyakto, Harsoyono. 1983. KUD Tumpuan Harapan Petani; in Swasono, Sri-Edi (Ed). 1983. Mencari Bentuk, Posisi dan Realitas Koperasi di Dalam Orde Ekonomi Indonesia. UI-Press. Jakarta. Rangkuti, Armijn. 1989. Kurikulum dan Silabi Mata Kuliah Koperasi di Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Airlangga; in DEKOPIN. 1989. Hasil Seminar Sehari tentang Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Koperasi di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta. Suryana, Achmad dan Sudi Mardiyanto. 2001. Bunga Rampai Ekonomi Beras (Editor). LPEM FEUI. Jakarta Whyte, William Foote and Katheleen King Whyte. 1988. Making Mondragon, The Growth and Dynamics of The Worker Co-operative Complex. ILR Press, New York. Prakash, Daman. 1998. Management Leadership Development in Agricultural Co- operative Business. International Co-operative Alliance, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. India. Prakash, Daman. 1986. Management of Co-operative Training in Indonesia, Some Recent Development; in Hassan Asnawi, 1986. Selected Reading on Co- operative Development in Indonesia. PUSLATPENKOP. Jakarta. Soedjono, Ibnoe. 1983. Masalah Peranan dan Kedudukan Koperasi dalam Hubungan dengan Pelaku Ekonomi Lainnya; in Swasono Sri-Edi. 1983. Mencari Bentuk, Posisi dan Realitas Koperasi di Dalam Orde Ekonomi Indonesia. UI-Press. Jakarta. Syarief, Abdullah. 1997. Membangun Usaha Koperasi Persusuan Mandiri, Pengalaman, Pemikiran dan Perjuangan Drh. H. Daman Danuwidjaja. Sumahamidjaja, Suparman. 1993. Membina Sikap Mental Wiraswasta. Gunung Jati. Jakarta. Swasono, Sri-Edi (Ed). 1983. Mencari Bentuk, Posisi dan Realitas Koperasi di Dalam Orde Ekonomi Indonesia. UI-Press. Jakarta. Wibisono, Christianto. 1998. Menelusuri Akar Krisis Indonesia. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta. Krisnamurthi, Bayu (Editor). 2005. Menumbuhkan Ide Dan Pemikiran : Pembangunan Sistem Dan Usaha Agribisnis (60 Tahun Bungaran Saragih). Pusat Studi Pembanguan Pertanian dan Pedesaan-LPPM IPB. Bogor. Nasution, Muslimin. 2007. Mewujudkan Demokrasi Ekonomi dengan Koperasi. PIP Publlishing. Jakarta. Atkinson, John W. 1974. Motivational Determinant of Risk Taking Behavior; in Atkinson, John W and Norman T Feather (Eds). A Theory of Achievement Motivation. Robert E Krieger Publishing Company, Hutington, New York. Murray, Edward J. 1964. Motivation and Emotion. Prentice-Hall Inc. New Jersey. Steers, Richard and Lyman W. Porter. 1991. Motivation and Work Behavior. McGraw- Hill Inc. New York Stoffregen, Heinz. 1994a. Kaufmann, Heinrich (1864-1928); in Dülfer Eberhard (Editor). 1994. International Handbook of Co-operative Organization. Vandenhoeck + Ruprecht. Göttingen. Tatuh, Jen. 2005. Mungkinkah Gagasan Agribisnis Menjadi Sebuah Gerakan Nasional; in Krisnamurthi Bayu (Editor). 2005. Menumbuhkan Ide dan Pemikiran : Pembangunan Sistem Dan Usaha Agribisnis (60 Tahun Bungaran Saragih). Soehardjo, A. Sistem Agribisnis dan Agroindustri. Makalah Seminar, 1997, MMA-IPB, Bogor Soekmadi, Rinekso. 2002. National Park Management in Indonesia: Focused on the Issues of Decentralization and Local Participation. Cuvllier Verlag. Göttingen. Koch, Eckard. 1985. Officialization of Co-operatives in Developing Countries; Genesis, Causes, Problems. Fredrich Ebert Stiftung. Bonn. Seetharaman, S P and N Mohanan. 1985. Organization Building in Co-operatives – A Framework. In Dülfer, Eberhard and Walter Hamm. 1985. Co-operatives in the Clash between Member Participation, Organisational Development and Bureaucratic Tendencies. Quiller Press. London. Sargent, M J and J R Nicholls. 1995. Outside Non-Executive Directors of UK Agricultural Co-operatives. The World of Co-operative Enterprise 1995. Pollard, Sidney. 1994. Owen, Robert (1771-1858); in Dülfer Eberhard (Editor). 1994. International Handbook of Co-operative Organization. Vandenhoeck + Ruprecht. Göttingen. Subyakto, Harsoyono. 1989. Paper untuk Partisipasi dalam Seminar Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Koperasi di Perguruan Tinggi; in DEKOPIN. 1989. Hasil Seminar Sehari tentang Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Koperasi di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta. Menumbuhkan Ide Dan Pemikiran : Pembangunan Sistem Dan Usaha Agribisnis (60 Tahun Bungaran Saragih). Pusat Studi Pembanguan Pertanian dan Pedesaan-LPPM IPB. Bogor Krisnamurthi, Bayu. 2002. Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Rakyat: Mencari Format Kebijakan Optimal. Jurnal Ekonomi Rakyat: Artikel -Th. I -No. 2 -April 2002. Soemanto, Wasty. 1999. Pendidikan Wiraswasta, Sekuncup Ide Operasional. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta. Suwandi, Adig. 2002. Pengamanan Harga Gula Republika Online, Oktober 1, 2002. Saaty, Thomas L. 1991. Pengambilan Keputusan Bagi Para Pemimpin. Pustaka Binaman Pressindo. Jakarta. Sanim, Bunasor. 2000. Penilaian Kritis Terhadap Kebijakan Makro dalam Pembangunan Pertanian, dalam Wibowo Rudi. 2000. Pertanian dan Pangan; Bunga Rampai Pemikiran Menuju Ketahanan Pangan. Sinar Harapan. Jakarta. Rahardjo, Dawam. 1997b. Peranan LSM dalam Pengembangan Koperasi di Tengah Arus Liberalisasi Ekonomi; in Soedjono Ibnoe, et.al. 1997. Koperasi di Tengah Arus Liberalisasi Ekonomi. Yayasan Formasi. Jakarta. Tambunan, Tulus T H. 2001. Perekonomian Indonesia: Teori dan Temuan Empiris. Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta. Wibowo, Rudi. 2000. Pertanian dan Pangan; Bunga Rampai Pemikiran Menuju Ketahanan Pangan. Sinar Harapan. Jakarta. Sumawinata, Sarbini. 2004. Politik Ekonomi Kerakyatan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta. Lembaga Manajemen PPM. 2000. Proceeding of The Indonesian Symposium on The Analytic Hierarchy Process -INSAHP. Jakarta. Seuster, Horst. 1994b. Raiffeisen, Friedrich Wilhelm (1818-1888); in Dülfer Eberhard (Editor). 1994. International Handbook of Co-operative Organization. Vandenhoeck + Ruprecht. Göttingen. Soedjono, Ibnoe. 2000b. Rancang Bangun Pola Koperasi Pertanian di Masa Datang; in. Djohan and Krisnamurthi. Membangun Koperasi Pertanian Berbasis Anggota. LSP2I-Inkopdit-Yappika. Jakarta. Parnell, Edgar. 1999. Reinventing Co-operation, The Challenge of the 21 st Century. Plunkett Foundation. Oxford. Soetrisno, Noer. 2001. Rekonstruksi Pemahaman Koperasi: Merajut Kekuatan Ekonomi Rakyat. Intrans. Jakarta Soetrisno, Noer. 1988. Evolution of Rural Co-operative in Indonesia; in Taimni K K (Editors). 1988. Asias' Rural Co-operatives. Oxford + IBH Publishing Co. PVT. LTD. New Delhi. Senge, Peter M. 1996. Rethinking Leadership in the Learning Organization. The System Thinker, Vol.7, Nr.1. Feb 1996. Akpoghor, Peter S. 1993. Selected Essays on Co-operative Theory and Practice. Marburg Consult for Self-Help Promotion. Marburg. Germany.. Soedjono, Ibnoe. 1985. Self-Help Promotion by Governmental and Semi Official Bodies, the Indonesian Experiences; in Dülfer and Hamm. 1985. Co- operatives in the Clash between Member Participation, Organisational Development and Bureaucratic Tendencies. Quiller Press. London. Nitta, Shunzo. 2000. Similarity and Difference in the Process of Economic Growth in Germany and Japan after World-War-II to the Present Time. Center for International Programs. Toyo University. Pambudy, Rachmat. 2005. Sistem Usaha Agribisnis yang Berkerakyatan, Berdaya Saing, Berkelanjutan, dan Terdesentralisasi, in Krisnamurthi Bayu (Editor). Shah, Ashish. 1999. Staatliche Genossenschaftsförderung und Genossenschaftsrecht in ASEAN, eine vergleichende Studie. Marburg Consult. Marburg. Vilstrup, Richard H, David W Cobia and Gene Ingalsbe. 1989. Structural Dynamics; in Cobia David W (ed). 1989. Co-operatives in Agriculture. Prentice Hall. New Jersey. Saragih, Bungaran. 2001. Suara dari Bogor: Membangun Sistem Agribisnis. Pustaka Wirausaha Muda. Bogor. Wibowo, Agung Pramono Priyo. 1997. Tantangan dalam Transformasi Organisasi: Suatu Pelajaran dari Pengelola Perubahan KUD. Jurnal Bisnis dan Birokrasi No.2, Vol.III, Agustus 1997, p. 70-79. Saaty, R W. 1987. The Analytic Hierarchy Process – What It Is and How It Is Used. Math Modelleing, Vol.9, No.4-5, p.161-176. Spendolini, Michael J. 1992. The Benchmarking Book. Ammcom. New York. Aschhoff, Gunther and Eckart Henningsen, 1996, The German Co-operative System, Its History, Structure and Strength, Fritz Knapp Verlag, Frankfurt. Likert, Rensis. 1967. The Human Organization. McGraw-Hill. New York. Münkner, Hans-H. 1983. The Legal Status of Pre-co-operatives (2 nd Ed.). Friedrich- Ebert-Stiftung. Bonn. Nilsson, Jerker. 1996. The Nature of Co-operative Values and Principles; Transaction Cost theoritical explanations. Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics 67:4, p. 633-653. Pratt, Garth. 1998. The Need for Performance Measurements in Co-operatives: A Practioners View. The World of Co-operative Enterprise. 1998, p.1-8. Amang Beddu. 1997. Tokoh Penggerak Koperasi Indonesia yang Tetap Mengabdi pada Cita-cita; in Tjokrowinoto et.al. 1997. Membangun Koperasi Sepenuh Hati. LSP2I. Jakarta. Thome, Thorsten. 1998. Unternehmer im Unternehmertum; Ein Beitrag zur Intrapreneurship – Diskussion. Philipps Universität. Marburg. Anderson, T. W. 1960. A Modification of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test to Reduce the Sample Size. Ann. Math. Statist 31:165-197 Sanim, Bunasor. 1998; Menggalakan Ekspor Buah-buahan Tropika: Salah satu Alternatif Mengatasi Krisis Ekonomi Indonesia. Agrimedia, Vol. 4 No.2, Juni 1998, p.16-25. Solahuddin, Soleh. 1998. Strategi Pengembangan Agribisnis dan Agroindustri dalam Mengatasi Krisis Ekonomi. Agrimedia, Vol. 4 No.2, Juni 1998. Hal:2-9 Suprapto, Ato. Komoditas Unggulan Ekspor Agribisnis Indonesia. Agrimedia, July 5, 2, 1999. Syam, Husain dan Syamsul Ma'arif, 2004; Kajian Perlunya Kebijakan Pengembangan Agroindustri sebagai Leading Sector. Agrimedia, Vol. 9 No.1, Maret 2004, p.32-39. Osborne, David and Ted Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government, How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. Reading Massachusetts. 2013-08-27 urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-z2013-04796 ppn:332976726 Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften 2013-10-28 Max ZUSSAMENFASSUNG In dieser Studie wurde der Beitrag der Führungskräfte der Genossenschaft hinsichtlich deren unternehmerischen Fähigkeit zum Erfolg der Genossenschaft untersucht. Welche Strategien wurden von ihnen zur Entwicklung der landwirtschaftlichen Genossenschaft formuliert? Diese allgemeine Zielsetzung der Studie konnte durch folgende Unterpunkte erzielt werden: (1) Faktoren, die die Entwicklung der Genossenschaft beeinflussen können, sind zu analysieren, um Erfolgslevel von landwirtschaftlichen Genossenschaft in Indonesien zu definieren. (2) Merkmale von genossenschaftlichen Unternehmern, die bereits erfolgreich sind, sind zu identifizieren. (3) Die Effektivität der durchgeführten Schulungs- und Bildungsprogrammen im Bereich Genossenschaftswesen ist zu evaluieren. (4) Strategien zur Entwicklung der genossenschaftlichen Unternehmern und der landwirtschaftlichen Genossenschaften in Indonesien sind zu formulieren. Die Studie wurde in dreißig Molkerei-Genossenschaften in den Provinzen West Java und Ost Java durchgeführt. Die Molkerei-Genossenschaften in Indonesien wurden entweder durch die Initiative der Regierung (Top-Down Ansatz) im Rahmen KUD-Programm oder durch Eigeninitiative der Milchbauer als nicht KUD-Genossenschaft (Bottom-Up Ansatz) gegründet. Aus diesem Grund wurde die Entscheidung für die Auswahl der Molkerei-Genossenschaft als Objekt der Studie bewusst getroffen. Die Performance der Genossenschaft im Jahr 2000 und das Wachstum des genossenschaftlichen Business über die fünf Jahre (1996-2000) wurden in dieser Studie analysiert. Die gesammelten Daten wurden hinsichtlich der geschäftlichen und organisatorischen Aspekte der Genossenschaft untersucht. 420 Personen wurden befragt. Die Teilnehmer waren Vorstandsmitglieder, Managers, Angestellten, Mitglieder sowie Nicht-Mitglieder der Genossenschaften. Zwei Indizes jeweils für die geschäftliche und organisatorische Variable konstruiert. Beide Indizes wurden grafisch dargestellt um Quadranten zu formen, um die dreißig Molkerei-Genossenschaften in vier verschiedenen Typologien zu gruppieren. Die besten Genossenschaften gehörten zur Typologie im Quadrant-I mit der besten Performance sowohl in der geschäftlichen als auch in den organisatorischen Aspekten. Es waren zehn Genossenschaften im Quadrant-I, vier im Quadrant-II, sowie zehn und sechs in Quadrant-III und –IV. Zusätzlich wurde aus den zwei Indizes ein Single-Index abgeleitet, nämlich der sogenannte Molkerei-Genossenschaft Entwicklungsindex, der die 30 teilnehmenden Genossenschaften in Genossenschaften mit bester bis zur schlechtesten Performance. Die Performance der Führungskräfte der Genossenschaft wurde durch Vergleich ihrer Leistung in den Quadranten analysiert. Eine statistische Bewertung wurde durchgeführt, um zu ermitteln, ob die Charaktere der Führungskräfte aus den unterschiedlichen Quadranten signifikant voneinander unterschiedlich waren, insbesondere, zwischen Quadrant-I und den anderen Quadranten. Diese Studie zeigt, dass Führungskräfte aus Quadrant-I besitzen Merkmale, die häufig als unternehmerische Merkmale bekannt sind, nämlich die höchste Punktzahl für innere Kontrollüberzeugung und das Streben nach Leistung, eine ideale Form der sozialen Motive, sowie eine moderate Einstellung zur Risikobereitschaft. Zur Untersuchung der dritten Zielsetzung dieser Studie wurde die Implementierung der CET Programme (die genossechafliche Schulungs- und Bildungsprogrammen) in Indonesien observiert. Die Primärdaten aus 58 Genossenschaft-Dozenten aus 32 Universitäten im ganzen Land gewonnen wurden. Und aus 206 Studenten ermittelt, die gerade das Studienfach Genossenschaft in vier verschiedenen Universitäten besuchten. Hinzu kamen Expertengespräch mit acht Experte im Bereich Genossenschaft. Für das Expertengespräch wurde das AHP-Verfahren (Analytical Hierarchy Process) verwendet. Die Ergebnisse zeigten dass die Implementierung der CET Programme in Indonesien war noch nicht effektiv hinsichtlich der Förderung zur Entwicklung der Genossenschaften. Zusätzlich, eine Überprüfung der Implementierung der genossenschaftlichen Bildung an den Universitäten zeigte, dass die genossenschaftliche Bildung noch nicht in der Lage war, die Studenten zu motivieren, um in der Entwicklung der Genossenschaft mitzuwirken. Drei Säulen zur Entwicklung der CE werden hier vorgeschlagen, nämlich (1) Aufbau von Verständnis und Selbstvertrauen in den Genossenschaften, (2) Entwicklung von Business und technologisches Wissen und Fähigkeiten, und (3) Entwicklung altruistischer Führungsstärke. Inzwischen liegt der Schwerpunkt der Strategie zur Entwicklung der Agribusiness Genossenschaften in der Entwicklung der existierenden Agribusiness Genossenschaften. Die Formulierung der Strategie verweist auf die Typologie der Genossenschaft und den Genossenschaft Entwicklungsindex. doctoralThesis