Firing versus Continuing Employment if an Economic Setback is Expected
A simple model evaluating a firm’s optimal employment reaction to an imminent recession is presented. Firing costs shelter employment – and this effect is typically amplified by uncertainty due to an option value of waiting. However, this job protection effect is reduced if the expected probability...
Saved in:
Published in: | MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 18-2009) |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Work |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | PDF Full Text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A simple model evaluating a firm’s optimal employment reaction to an imminent recession is presented. Firing costs shelter employment – and this effect is typically amplified by uncertainty due to an option value of waiting. However, this job protection effect is reduced if the expected probability of a setback increases, and if the expected duration and size of a recession grows. If a severe recession is expected with a high probability the option to wait with firing looses its value, thus, immediate layoffs and market exits become the optimal strategy even before the recession turns out to be actual. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1867-3678 |
DOI: | 10.17192/es2023.0232 |