Thinking Religion and Religious Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17192/mjr.2025.26.8853Keywords:
Religious studies, history of religions, philosophy of religion, religious thought, phenomenology of religion, comparative religion, multi-disciplinarity, reductionism, essence of religion, Martin Heidegger, Friedrich Max Müller, methodologyAbstract
This article argues religious studies is a discipline specifically designed for answering the big questions about religion. The comparative and general study of religion is what emerges when scholarship abandons the big questions about religion. This occurs first by the field’s distancing from theology and later philosophy. Historical and phenomenological approaches present religious studies as a pluralistic and multidisciplinary research field, whilst arguably it is originally polymethodic. The difference, I argue, is that the religious studies discipline is better defined by a multiple methods approach rather than a disciplinary hybridity. I make my argument by discussing the philosophical method of “thinking” as necessary to reclaim for religious studies and specifically making the case for thinking as a key method for religious studies research.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Milad Melani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Overall copyright is assigned to Marburg Journal of Religion. Authors retain copyright for individual contributions and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.An author may give permission for an article published here to be published elsewhere, provided that the source is indicated in the form "First published in Marburg Journal of Religion, Volume 00 (year), Number 00".