Dokument

Summary:
Quantification of existing theories is a great challenge but also a great chance for the study of language in the brain. While quantification is necessary for the development of precise theories, it demands new methods and new perspectives. In light of this, four complementary methods were introduced to provide a quantitative and computational account of the extended Argument Dependency Model from Bornkessel-Schlesewsky and Schlesewsky. First, a computational model of human language comprehension was introduced on the basis of dependency parsing. This model provided an initial comparison of two potential mechanisms for human language processing, the traditional "subject" strategy, based on grammatical relations, and the "actor" strategy based on prominence and adopted from the eADM. Initial results showed an advantage for the traditional subject" model in a restricted context; however, the "actor" model demonstrated behavior in a test run that was more similar to human behavior than that of the "subject" model. Next, a computational-quantitative implementation of the "actor" strategy as weighted feature comparison between memory units was used to compare it to other memory-based models from the literature on the basis of EEG data. The "actor" strategy clearly provided the best model, showing a better global fit as well as better match in all details. Building upon the success modeling EEG data, the feasibility of estimating free parameters from empirical data was demonstrated. Both the procedure for doing so and the necessary software were introduced and applied at the level of individual participants. Using empirically estimated parameters, the models from the previous EEG experiment were calculated again and yielded similar results, thus reinforcing the previous work. In a final experiment, the feasibility of analyzing EEG data from a naturalistic auditory stimulus was demonstrated, which conventional wisdom says is not possible. The analysis suggested a new perspective on the nature of event-related potentials (ERPs), which does not contradict existing theory yet nonetheless goes against previous intuition. Using this new perspective as a basis, a preliminary attempt at a parsimonious neurocomputational theory of cognitive ERP components was developed.

Bibliographie / References

3. Nivre, J. et al. (2007). " MaltParser: A Language-Independent System for Data-Driven Depen- dency Parsing " . In: Natural Language Engineering 13.2, pp. 95–135.
4. Baayen, R. H., D. J. Davidson, and D. M. Bates (2008). " Mixed-effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items " . In: Journal of Memory and Language 59, pp. 390–412.
5. Nivre, J. (2009). " Parsing Indian Languages with MaltParser " . In: Proceedings of the ICON09 NLP Tools Contest: Indian Language Dependency Parsing, pp. 12–18.
6. Honnibal, M., Y. Goldberg, and M. Johnson (2013). " A Non-Monotonic Arc-Eager Transition System for Dependency Parsing " . In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Computa- tional Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 163–172.
7. – (2013). " Reconciling Time, Space and Function: A New Dorsal-Ventral Stream Model of Sentence Comprehension " . In: Brain and Language 125, pp. 60–76. DOI: 10 . 1016 / j . bandl . 2013.01.010.
8. – (2014). " Towards a Computational Model of Actor-based Language Comprehension " . In: Neuroinformatics 12.1, pp. 143–179. DOI: 10.1007/s12021-013-9198-x.
9. – (in press). " The Argument Dependency Model " . In: Neurobiology of Language. Ed. by G. Hickok and S. Small. Academic Press. Chap. 30. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00030-4. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., M. Schlesewsky, et al. (in press). " Neurobiological Roots of Lan- guage in Primate Audition: Common Computational Properties " . In: Trends in Cognitive Sci- ences. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.008. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. and M. Schlesewsky (2008). " An Alternative Perspective on " Se- mantic P600 " Effects in Language Comprehension " . In: Brain Research Reviews 59, pp. 55–73.
10. Philipp, M. et al. (2008). " The Role of Animacy in the Real Time Comprehension of Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from Auditory Event-Related Brain Potentials " . In: Brain and Language 105.2, pp. 112–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.09.005.
11. Crepaldi, D. et al. (2011). " A Place for Nouns and a Place for Verbs? A Critical Review of Neu- rocognitive Data on Grammatical-class Effects " . In: Brain and Language 116.1, pp. 33–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.005.
12. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., F. Kretzschmar, et al. (2011). " Think Globally: Cross-linguistic Variation in Electrophysiological Activity during Sentence Comprehension " . In: Brain and Language 117.3. First Neurobiology of Language Conference: NLC 2009, Neurobiology of Language Conference, pp. 133–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.010. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. and M. Schlesewsky (2009). " The Role of Prominence Informa- tion in the Real-Time Comprehension of Transitive Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Ap- proach " . In: Language and Linguistics Compass 3.1, pp. 19–58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008. 00099.x.
13. Sassenhagen, J., M. Schlesewsky, and I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky (2014). " The P600-as-P3 Hy- pothesis Revisited: Single-trial Analyses Reveal that the Late EEG Positivity Following Lin- guistically Deviant Material is Reaction Time Aligned " . In: Brain and Language 137, pp. 29– 39. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.010.
14. Frank, S. L. et al. (2015). " The ERP Response to the Amount of Information Conveyed by Words in Sentences " . In: Brain and Language 140, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.006.
15. Garrido, M. I. et al. (2009). " The Mismatch Negativity: A Review of Underlying Mechanisms " . In: Clinical Neurophysiology 120.3, pp. 453–463. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029.
16. Van Petten, C. and B. J. Luka (2012). " Prediction during Language Comprehension: Benefits, Costs, and ERP Components " . In: International Journal of Psychophysiology 83.2, pp. 176–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015.
17. Haupt, F. S. et al. (2008). " The Status of Subject–Object Reanalyses in the Language Compre- hension Architecture " . In: Journal of Memory and Language 59, pp. 54–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml. 2008.02.003.
18. Barr, D. J. (2008). " Analyzing 'Visual World' Eyetracking Data using Multilevel Logistic Re- gression " . In: Journal of Memory and Language 59.4, pp. 457–474. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.09. 002.
19. Jaeger, T. F. (2008). " Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (Transformation or Not) and Towards Logit Mixed Models " . In: Journal of Memory and Language 59.4, pp. 434–446. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
20. Barr, D. J. et al. (2013). " Random Effects Structure for Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing: Keep It Maximal " . In: Journal of Memory and Language 68, pp. 255–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11. 001.
21. Vigliocco, G. et al. (2011). " Nouns and Verbs in the Brain: A Review of Behavioural, Electro- physiological, Neuropsychological and Imaging Studies " . In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 35.3, pp. 407–426. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007.
22. Tyler, L. K. et al. (2004). " Neural processing of nouns and verbs: the role of inflectional mor- phology " . In: Neuropsychologia 42.4, pp. 512–523. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10. 001.
23. Lotze, N. et al. (2011). " Meaningful Physical Changes Mediate Lexical-Semantic Integration: Top-Down and Form-based Bottom-Up Information Sources Interact in the N400 " . In: Neu- ropsychologia 49, pp. 3573–3582. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.009.
24. Deco, G., E. T. Rolls, and R. Romo (2009). " Stochastic Dynamics as a Principle of Brain Func- tion " . In: Progress in Neurobiology 88.1, pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.01.006.
25. Deco, G., E. T. Rolls, L. Albantakis, et al. (2013). " Brain Mechanisms for Perceptual and Reward-related Decision-making " . In: Progress in Neurobiology 103.194–213. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.01.010.
26. Fidler, F. et al. (2004). " Statistical Reform in Medicine, Psychology and Ecology " . In: The Jour- nal of Socio-Economics 33, pp. 615–630. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.035.
27. Lewis, R. L., S. Vasishth, and J. A. Van Dyke (2006). " Computational Principles of Working Memory in Sentence Comprehension " . In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10.10, pp. 447–454. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007.
28. Luck, S. J. and E. K. Vogel (2013). " Visual Working Memory Capacity: from Psychophysics and Neurobiology to Individual Differences " . In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17.8, pp. 391–400. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006.
29. Gibson, E. (1998). " Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies " . In: Cognition 68, pp. 1–76. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1.
30. Friederici, A. D. (2002). " Towards a Neural Basis of Auditory Sentence Processing " . In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6.2, pp. 78–84. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01839-8.
31. Seidenberg, M. S. and M. F. Joanisse (2003). " Show Us the Model " . In: Trends in Cognitive Sci- ences 7.3, pp. 106–107. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00020-2.
32. Wolpert, D. M. (1997). " Computational Approaches to Motor Control " . In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1.6, pp. 209–216. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01070-X.
33. Kok, A. (2001). " On the Utility of P3 Amplitude as a Measure of Processing Capacity " . In: Psychophysiology 38.3, pp. 557–577. DOI: 10.1017/S0048577201990559.
34. Howes, A., R. L. Lewis, and A. Vera (2009). " Rational Adaptation under Task and Processing Constraints: Implications for Testing Theories of Cognition and Action " . In: Psychological Review 116.4, pp. 717–751. DOI: 10.1037/a0017187.
35. Heekeren, H. et al. (2004). " A General Mechanism for Perceptual Decision-making in the Hu- man Brain " . In: Nature 431.7010, pp. 859–862. DOI: 10.1038/nature02966.
36. Rauschecker, J. P. and S. K. Scott (2009). " Maps and Streams in the Auditory cortex: Nonhu- man Primates Illuminate Human Speech Processing " . In: Nature Neuroscience 12.6, pp. 718– 724. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2331.
37. Giraud, A.-L. and D. Poeppel (2012). " Cortical Oscillations and Speech Processing: Emerging Computational Principles and Operations " . In: Nature Neuroscience 15.4, pp. 511–517. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3063.
38. O'Connell, R. G., P. M. Dockree, and S. P. Kelly (2012). " A Supramodal Accumulation-To-Bound Signal that Determines Perceptual Decisions in Humans " . In: Nature Neuroscience 15.12, pp. 1729–1735. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3248.
39. Lau, E. F., C. Phillips, and D. Poeppel (2008). " A Cortical Network for Semantics: (De)constructing the N400 " . In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9.12, pp. 920–933. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2532.
40. DeWitt, I. and J. P. Rauschecker (2012). " Phoneme and Word Recognition in the Auditory Ventral Stream " . In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109.8, E505–E514. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1113427109.
41. Federmeier, K. D. et al. (2000). " Brain Responses to Nouns, Verbs and Class-ambiguous Words in Context " . In: Brain 123.12, pp. 2552–2566. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.12.2552.
42. Kretzschmar, F., I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, and M. Schlesewsky (2009). " Parafoveal versus Foveal N400s Dissociate Spreading Activation from Contextual Fit " . In: NeuroReport 20.18, pp. 1613–1618. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328332c4f4.
43. Friston, K. (2005). " A Theory of Cortical Responses " . In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360.1456, pp. 815–836. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1622. Bibliography Friston, K. (2009). " The Free-energy Principle: a Rough Guide to the Brain? " In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13.7, pp. 293–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005.
44. Friston, K. and S. Kiebel (2009). " Predictive Coding under the Free-energy Principle " . In: Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364.1521, pp. 1211–1221. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0300.
45. – (2010). " Dependency Parsing " . In: Language and Linguistics Compass 4.3, pp. 138–152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00187.x.
46. Kutas, M. and K. D. Federmeier (2011). " Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP) " . In: Annual Review of Psychol- ogy 62.1, pp. 621–647. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123.
47. Jonides, J. et al. (2008). " The Mind and Brain of Short-Term Memory " . In: Annual Reviews 59, pp. 193–224. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093615.
48. – (2011). " The Brain Basis of Language Processing: from Structure to Function " . In: Physio- logical Reviews 91.4, pp. 1357–1392. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011.
49. Simmons, J. P., L. D. Nelson, and U. Simonsohn (2011). " False-Positive Psychology : Undis- closed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Signifi- cant " . In: Psychological Science 22.11, pp. 1359–1366. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611417632. Bibliography Tune, S. et al. (2014). " Cross-linguistic Variation in the Neurophysiological Response to Se- mantic Processing: Evidence from Anomalies at the Borderline of Awareness " . In: Neu- ropsychologia 56, pp. 147–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.007.
50. – (2014). " The New Statistics: Why and How " . In: Psychological Science 20.10, pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613504966.
51. Wagenmakers, E.-J. et al. (2012). " An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research " . In: Perspec- tives on Psychological Science 7.6, pp. 632–638. DOI: 10.1177/174569161246307.
52. – (in press). " Discovering Prominence and its Role in Language Processing: An Individual (Differences) Approach " . In: Linguistic Vanguard. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2014-1013.
53. Kliegl, R., P. Wei, et al. (2010). " Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention " . In: Frontiers in Psychology 1.238. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00238. Bibliography Knoeferle, P., T. P. Urbach, and M. Kutas (2014). " Different Mechanisms for Role Relations versus Verb–action Congruence Effects: Evidence from ERPs in Picture–sentence Verifica- tion " . In: Acta Psychologica 152, pp. 133–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.004.
54. – (2013). " Random Effects Structure for Testing Interactions in Linear Mixed-effects Mod- els " . In: Frontiers in Psychology 4.328. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328.
55. Frenzel, S., M. Schlesewsky, and I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky (2015). " Two Routes to Actorhood: Lexicalized Potency to Act and Identification of the Actor Role " . In: Frontiers in Psychology 6.1. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00001.
56. Popper, K. (1934). Logik der Forschung. Mohr Siebeck.
57. Alday, P. M., M. Schlesewsky, and I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky (2012). Towards a Computational Model of Actor-based Language Comprehension. Poster presented at the Neurobiology of Lan- guage Conference. San Sebastian.
58. MacWhinney, B., E. Bates, and R. Kliegl (1984). " Cue Validity and Sentence Interpretation in English, German and Italian " . In: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23.2, pp. 127– 50. Bibliography Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). " On the Generalised Distance in Statistics " . In: Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India 2.1, pp. 49–55.
59. McElree, B. (2006). " Accessing Recent Events " . In: The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Ed. by B. H. Ross. Vol. 46. San Diego: Academic Press.
60. Dawson, M. (1998). Understanding Cognitive Science. Blackwell Publishing.
61. Schumacher, P. B. (2011). " The Hepatitis Called … Electrophysiological Evidence for Enriched Composition " . In: Experimental Pragmatics/Semantics. Ed. by J. Meibauer and M. Steinbach. John Benjamins, pp. 199–219.
62. – (2000). " The Dependency Locality Theory: A Distance-based Theory of Linguistic Complex- ity " . In: Image, Language, Brain. Ed. by Y. Miyashita, A. Marantz, and W. O'Neil. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 95–126.
63. Coulson, S., J. W. King, and M. Kutas (1998a). " ERPs and Domain Specificity: Beating a Straw Horse " . In: Language and Cognitive Processes 13.6, pp. 653–672.
64. – (2014). " Competition in Argument Interpretation: Evidence from the Neurobiology of Language " . In: Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage. Ed. by B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov, and E. Moravcsik. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Frisch, S. and M. Schlesewsky (2001). " The N400 Reflects Problems of Thematic Hierarchiz- ing " . In: NeuroReport 12.15, pp. 3391–3394.
66. Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge Univer- sity Press.
67. – (2014b). Tracking the Emergence of Meaning in the Brain during Natural Story Comprehension. Poster presented at the International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON). Bris- bane.
68. In: Ideas of | for Europe. An Interdisciplinary Approach to European Identity. Ed. by T. Pinheiro, B. Cieszynska, and E. Franco. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 271–284
69. Cumming, G. (2013). Understanding The New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta- Analysis. Multivariate Applications Series. Taylor and Francis.
70. Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press.
71. Primus, B. (1999). Cases and Thematic Roles. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
72. Shapiro, K. and A. Caramazza (2003). " The Representation of Grammatical Categories in the Brain " . In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7.5, pp. 201–206. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00060- 3.
73. Roehm, D. et al. (2004). " Fractionating Language Comprehension via Frequency Characteris- tics of the Human EEG " . In: NeuroReport 15.3, pp. 409–412.
74. Bornkessel, I., M. Schlesewsky, and A. D. Friederici (2002). " Grammar Overrides Frequency: Evidence from Online Processing of Flexible Word Order " . In: Cognition 85, B21–B30.
75. Bornkessel, I. (2002). " The Argument Dependency Model: A Neurocognitive Approach to In- cremental Interpretation " . PhD thesis. University of Potsdam.
76. Bornkessel, I. and M. Schlesewsky (2006). " The Extended Argument Dependency Model: A Neurocognitive Approach to Sentence Comprehension Across Languages " . In: Psychologi- cal Review 113.4, pp. 787–821.
77. Brouwer, H., H. Fitz, and J. Hoeks (2012). " Getting Real about Semantic Illusions: Rethink- ing the Functional Role of the P600 in Language Comprehension " . In: Brain Research 1446, pp. 127–143.
78. Marr, D. and T. Poggio (1976). " From Understanding Computation to Understanding Neural Circuitry " . In: AI Memos 357.
79. Van Valin, R. D. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.
80. Alday, P. M., A. Nagels, et al. (2011). Actor Identification in Natural Stories: Qualitative Distinctions in the Neural Bases of Actor-related Features. Talk presented at the Neurobiology of Language Conference. Annapolis.
81. Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney (1989). " Cross-linguistic Research in Language Acquisition and Language Processing " . In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Basque Language and Culture. San Sebastian: Basque Regional Government. Bibliography Bates, E., S. McNew, et al. (1982). " Functional Constraints on Sentence Processing: A Cross- linguistic Study " . In: Cognition 11, pp. 245–299.
82. – (submitted). " Electrophysiology Reveals the Neural Dynamics of Naturalistic Auditory Lan- guage Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reflect Continuous Model Updates " . In: Journal of Neuroscience.
83. Alday, P. M., J. Sassenhagen, and I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky (2014a). Neural Signatures of Incre- mental Text Processing Correlate with Word Entropy in a Natural Story Context. Poster presented at the Society for Neurobiology of Language Conference. Amsterdam.
84. A. Non-Replicable LOO Results A.1. Ambiguous A.1.1. Prominence Labels Active Verbs Object-Experiencer Verbs A. Non-Replicable LOO Results A.1.2. Grammatical-Relation Labels Active Verbs Object-Experiencer Verbs A. Non-Replicable LOO Results A.2. Unambiguous A.2.1. Prominence Labels Active Verbs Object-Experiencer Verbs A. Non-Replicable LOO Results A.2.2. Grammatical-Relation Labels Active Verbs Object-Experiencer Verbs Curriculum Vitae (English) Education since 10.2010 Dr. phil. (PhD-equivalent) Linguistics, Philipps-Universität Marburg 2010 MA Linguistics of German, Philipps-Universität Marburg 2008 BS Mathematics Honors, University of Notre Dame du Lac 2008 BA German Language and Literature with Honors, University of Notre Dame du Lac Publications P. M. Alday (to appear). " Be Careful When Assuming the Obvious: Commentary on " The Placement of the head that minimizes online memory: a complex systems approach " " . In: Language Dynamics and Change 5.1
85. M. Alday (2012). " Province on a Hill: South Tyrol as a Mircocosm of European Federalism " .
86. Alday, P. M. (2010). " Regularisierungstendenzen in der Morphologie germanischer Sprachen " . MA thesis. Philipps-Universität Marburg.
87. Meyer, W. S. et al. (1909). " Sanskrit Literature " . In: The Imperial Gazetteer of India 2.
88. Dröge, A., M. Schlesewsky, and I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky (2012). Separable Effects of Lexical As- sociation and Plausibility on the N400. Poster presented at the Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP) Conference. Riva del Garda, Italy.
89. Gelman, A. and E. Loken (2013). " The Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even When There is No " Fishing Expedition " or " p-hacking " and the Research Hypothesis was Posited Ahead of Time " . In:
90. MacWhinney, B. and E. Bates, eds. (1989). The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cam- bridge University Press.
91. Whitney, C. et al. (2009). " Neural Correlates of Narrative Shifts during Auditory Story Com- prehension " . In: NeuroImage 47, pp. 360–366.
92. Comrie, B. (2011). " Alignment of Case Marking of Full Noun Phrases " . In: The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Ed. by M. S. Dryer and M. Haspelmath. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.
93. Dowty, D. (1991). " Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection " . In: Language 67.3, pp. 547– 619.
94. Kutas, M. and S. A. Hillyard (1980). " Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity " . In: Science 207.4427, pp. 203–205.
95. Basten, U. et al. (2010). " How the Brain Integrates Costs and Benefits during Decision Mak- ing. " In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107.50, pp. 21767–21772.
96. Winkler, I., S. Haufe, and M. Tangermann (2011). " Automatic Classification of Artifactual ICA- Components for Artifact Removal in EEG Signals " . In: Behavioral and Brain Functions 7.1.
97. Kutas, M., G. McCarthy, and E. Donchin (1977). " Augmenting Mental Chronometry: The P300 as a Measure of Stimulus Evaluation Time " . In: Science 197.4305, pp. 792–795.
98. – (1998b). " Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Vio- lations " . In: Language and Cognitive Processes 13.1, pp. 21–58.

Das Dokument ist im Internet frei zugänglich - Hinweise zu den Nutzungsrechten