Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Marburg

Titel:Die Entstehung regionaler Innovationsnetzwerke unter Einfluss politischer Förderung - Ein longitudinaler und interdisziplinärer Forschungsansatz
Autor:Dettmann, Anja
Weitere Beteiligte: Brenner, Thomas (Prof. Dr. Dr.)
Veröffentlicht:2012
URI:https://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/diss/z2012/1100
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17192/z2012.1100
URN: urn:nbn:de:hebis:04-z2012-11001
DDC:910 Geografie, Reisen
Titel(trans.):The Development of Regional Innovation Networks under Political Funding - A Longitudinal and Interdisciplinary Approach
Publikationsdatum:2013-02-22
Lizenz:https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/

Dokument

Schlagwörter:
Socialpsychology, Evolutionary, Netzwerk, Politik, Innovationsforschung, Region, Sozialpsychologie, Innovation network, Political funding

Zusammenfassung:
Innovationsnetzwerke gelten heute als Schlüssel für eine langfristige und positive Entwicklung von Unternehmen und Regionen. Sowohl in der Wissenschaft als auch in der Politik sind diese Partnerverbünde darum ein vielbeachtetes Thema. Die vorliegende Arbeit geht bei der Untersuchung von fast 50 geförderten Innovationsnetzwerken einen neuen Weg und erforscht diese nicht mehr als System von Beziehungen, sondern als Gruppe im Sinne einer sozialen und einer Arbeitseinheit. Wie diese Verbünde über die Zeit und mittels der Unterstützung eines Förderprogramms die Fähigkeit zur Innovation erlangen und welche Rolle dabei Raum, Umfeldfaktoren, Beziehungen und die Eigenschaften des Verbundes als Gruppe spielen, zeigen die hier erarbeiteten Untersuchungsergebnisse auf. In dieser Arbeit werden zum ersten Mal sozialpsychologische Theorien und Forschungsansätze systematisch in die Wirtschaftsgeographie übertragen. Am Ende wird deutlich, dass Innovationskraft auch maßgeblich dadurch entsteht, dass Netzwerkakteure ein echtes Team werden.

Summary:
Innovation networks in science became very popular during the last 15 years. One reason is that innovations are seen as a main trigger for economic development today. Another reason is that in a densely connected world networks of relationships have a key role in innovation processes. But how people build up relationships, exchange information and create something new are fascinating but also incredible complex processes. Both, the fascination and the complexity, lead to the tremendous amount of innovation studies we see today in science. Additionally, politicians in Germany and Europe were also caught by the concept of innovation networks – and even more by the economic effects a successful initiation of those networks can have. For instance, due to the political programs of the ‘Bund’, today we have more than 200 funded innovation networks in Germany and more are still being set up. Thus, political funding became a very important trigger and shaper of innovation networks in Germany. But, the networks political programs create are very different to the scientific understanding of innovation networks. Whereas in science they are nodes and ties uncovered by the scientist, for politicians they are rather a group of co-operating people, visible and conscious to their envi-ronment. But how to study such a group-like network with the relationship-orientated tools we currently have in science? This is the first basic question this thesis will apply to. For this purpose, firstly group-like innovation networks are theoretically characterised in order to design secondly a new approach that can study their development. To develop this approach – which basically analyses six features standing for a group’s ability to work and innovate – social psychological literature is included and for the first time linked to the literature on innovation net-works and economic geography. So the two main questions of this thesis are (1) how influential is space on network (group) processes and characteristics and (2) how important is the network’s development as a social and work entity for a later innovation’s success? Hence, geographical as well as social psychological questions are posed to the development of innovation networks in this thesis. But talking about network development indicates that this approach is one of the few analysing innovation networks over time. Therefore, distinct stages of network formation are developed theoretically and conceptually. In order to compare different stages of development, the network information is gained in a highly standardised way from documents and interviews with network managers of 49 public funded innovation networks in the Neue Länder (eastern Part of Germany). This standardisation opened up the chance to use statistical analysis tech-niques. This way, social processes and relations lying beyond an individual awareness can be discovered mathematically. This is the key to actually realise the developed approach: measur-ing characteristics and processes of innovation networks on the level of groups. Finally, going back to the policy, this thesis aims to analyse the impact of public funding on the development of innovation networks. All of the 49 analysed networks were funded by ‘Innovationsforen’ – a program made by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). With the distinct conceptualisation of the funding stage and programmatic items, this study is one of the very view that can shed light on the ‘when’, ‘how’ and ‘how long’ of funding effects in the network formation. In summary, this thesis is a careful first step in the field of a social psychological network analysis in a longitudinal way.

Bibliographie / References

  1. SYDOW, Jörg (2001): Management von Unternehmens- netzwerken -Auf dem Weg zu einer Reflexiven Netzwerkentwicklung? In: HOWALDT, Jürgen (2001): Kooperationsverbünde und regionale Modernisie- rung -Theorie und Praxis der Netzwerkarbeit: 79- 101. Gabler -Wiesbaden.
  2. WEICK, Karl E. (1976): Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1-19.
  3. STABER, Udo (2001): Steuerung von Unternehmens- netzwerken: Organisationstheoretische Perspekti- ven auf soziale Mechanismen. In: SYDOW, Jörg und ARNOLD WINDELER (2001): Steuerung von Netzwer- ken -Konzepte und Praktiken: 58-106. Westdeut- scher Verlag -Opladen.
  4. TUCKMAN, Bruce W. (1965): Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. In: Psychological Bulletin 63 (6): 384- 399.
  5. U | UCBASARAN, Deniz; Andy LOCKETT; Mike WRIGHT und Paul WESTHEAD (2003): Entrepreneurial Founder Teams: Factors Assiciated with Member Entry and Exit. In: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28 (2): 107- 125.
  6. TORRE, André (2008): On the Role Played by Temporary Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Transmis- sion. In: Regional Studies 42 (6): 869-889.
  7. Y | YEUNG, Henry Wai-Chung (2008): Perspectives on Inter- organizational Relations in Economic Geography. In: CROPPER, Steve; Mark EBERS; Chris HUXHAM und Peter SMITH RING (2008): The Oxford Handbook of Interorganizational Relations: 473-501. Oxford University Press -Oxford.
  8. V | VAN KLINK, Arjen und Peter DE LANGEN (2001): Cycles in Industrial Clusters: The Case of the Shipbuilding Industry in the Northern Netherlands. In: Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 92 (4): 449- 463.
  9. SHAW, James B. und Elain BARRETT-POWER (1998): The Effects of Diversity on Small Work Group Processes and Performance. In: Human Relations 51 (10): 1307-1325.
  10. THOMI, Walter und Rolf STERNBERG (2008): Cluster -zur Dynamik von Begrifflichkeiten und Konzeptionen. In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie 52 (2-3): 73-78.
  11. SINGH, Jasjit (2008): Distributed R & D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output. In: Research Policy 37 (1): 77 -96.
  12. Z | ZAHEER, Akbar und Geoffrey G. BELL (2005): Benefiting from Network Position: Firm Capabilities, Structural Holes, and Performance. In: Strategic Management Journal 26 (9): 809-825.
  13. SHAPIRO, Debra L.; Blair H. SHEPPARD und Lisa CHERASKIN (1992): Buisness on a Handshake. In: Negotiation Journal 8 (4): 365-377.
  14. TARTARI, Valentina; Ammon SALTER; Pablo D'ESTE und Markus PERKMANN (2010): Come Engage With Me: The Role of Behavioral and Attitudinal Cohort Ef- fects on Academics' Levels of Engagement with Industry. Paper at Conference: DRUID-DIME Acad- emy Winter 2010 PhD Conference, Aalborg.
  15. SHAW, Marvin E. (1964): Communication Networks. In: BERKOWITZ, Leonard (1964): Advances in Experimen- tal Social Psychology, Volume 1: 111-148.
  16. TYLER, Tom R. und Steven L. BLADER (2000): Cooperation in Groups -Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. Psychology Press -Phila- delphia.
  17. SPIEß, Erika (1998): Das Konzept der Emphatie. In: SPIEß, Erika (1998): Formen der Kooperation -Bedingun- gen und Perspektiven: 53-61. Verlag für Angewand- te Psychologie -Göttingen.
  18. WOLFF, Stephan (2007): Dokument-und Aktenanalyse. In: FLICK, Uwe; Ernst von KARDORFF und Ines STEINKE (2007): Qualitative Forschung -ein Handbuch: 502- 513. Rowohlt-Taschenbuch-Verlag -Reinbek bei Hamburg.
  19. STORPER, Michael (1996): Innovation as Collective Action: Conventions, Products and Technologies. In: Industrial and Corporate Change 5 (3): 761-790.
  20. TSAI, Wenpin (2001): Knowledge Transfer in Intraorga- nizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innova- tion and Performance. In: The Academy of Man- agement Journal 44 (5): 996-1004.
  21. VISSER, Evert-Jan und Ron BOSCHMA (2004): Learning in Districts: Novelty and Lock-in in a Regional Context. In: European Planning Studies 12 (6): 793-808. LITERATUR XXIII W | WASSERMAN, Stanley und Katherine FAUST (1994): Social Network Analysis -Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press -Cambridge.
  22. WEISBAND, Suzanne (2002): Maintaining Awareness in Distributed Teams: Implications for Leadership and Performance. In: HINDS, Pamela J. und Sara KIESLER (2002): 311-334. Distributed Work: MIT Press - Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  23. THOMPSON, Leigh L. (2004): Making the Team -A Guide for Managers. Pearson Prentice Hall -Upper Saddle River.
  24. SYDOW, Jörg (2010): Management von Netzwerkorga- nisationen -Zum Stand der Forschung. In: SYDOW, Jörg (2010): Management von Netzwerkorganisati- onen -Beiträge aus der 'Managementforschung': 373-470. Gabler Verlag -Wiesbaden.
  25. WESTLE, Bettina und Oscar W. GABRIEL (2008): Sozialka- pital. Nomos-Verlags-Gesellschaft -Baden-Baden. WHITENER, Ellen M.; Susan E. BRODT; M. Audrey KORSGAARD und John M. WERNER (1998): Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trust- worthy Behavior. In: The Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 513-530.
  26. TIDD, Joe und John BESSANT (2011): Managing Innova- tion: Integrating Technological, Market and Orga- nizational Change. Wiley -Chichester.
  27. VANSINA, Leopold; Tharsi TAILLIEU und Sandra SCHRUIJER (1998): ''Managing'' Multi-party Issues: Learning from Experience. In: PASMORE, William A. und Ri- chard W. WOODMAN (1998): Research in Oganiza- tional Change and Development, Vol.11 -An An- nual Series Featuring Advances in Theory, Metho- dology and Research: 159-181.
  28. T | TAPPI, Deborah (2004): On the Unit of Analysis in the Study of Networks. In: FORNAHL, Dirk und Thomas BRENNER (2004): Cooperation, Networks and Institu- tions in Regional Innovation Systems: 149-170. Elgar -Cheltenham.
  29. WIECHMANN, Thorsten (2005): Politisch prekär und methodisch limitiert? -Zur Evaluierung von Regio- nalen Entwicklungskonzepten. In: ROLFES, Manfred und Thomas WEITH (2005): Evaluation in der Praxis -Aktuelle Beispiele aus der Stadt-, Regional-und Umweltentwicklung: 163-176. Universitäts-Verlag - Potsdam.
  30. TER WAL, Anne (2009): Proximity and Partner Selection -Matching Amongst Inventors in German Biotech- nology. Discussion Paper at: Utrecht University. TETHER, Bruce (2002): Who Co-operates for Innovation, and Why -An Empirical Analysis. In: Research Policy (31): 947-967.
  31. VEUGELERSA, Reinhilde und Bruno CASSIMAN (2005): R&D Cooperation between Firms and Universities -Some Empirical Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing. Discussion Paper at: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and IESE Business School.
  32. SWEDBERG, Richard (1991): Schumpeter -A Biography. Princeton University Press -Princeton.
  33. SMITH, P.C. und J. LAAGE-HELLMAN (1994): Small Group Analysis in Industrial Networks. In: AXELSSON, Björn und Geoffrey EASTON (1994): Industrial networks -A New View of Reality: 37-61. Routledge -London.
  34. WELLMAN, Barry und Stephen D. BERKOWITZ (1991): Social structures. Cambridge University Press - Cambridge.
  35. SYDOW, Jörg und ARNOLD WINDELER (2001): Steuerung von und in Netzwerken -Perspektiven, Konzepte, vor allem aber offene Fragen. In: SYDOW, Jörg und ARNOLD WINDELER (2001): Steuerung von Netzwer- ken -Konzepte und Praktiken: 1-24. Westdeutscher Verlag -Opladen.
  36. SYDOW, Jörg (1992): Strategische Netzwerke -Evolution und Organisation. Gabler -Wiesbaden.
  37. STORPER, Michael und Richard WALKER (1989): The Capitalist Imperative -Territory, Technology, and Industrial Growth. Blackwell -New York. SWAN, Jacqueline; Harry SCARBROUGH und Maxine ROBERTSON (2003): Linking Knowledge, Networking and Innovation Process: A Conceptual Model. In: SHAVININA, Larisa V. (2003): The International Hand- book on Innovation: 680-694. Elsevier Science Ltd. - Oxford.
  38. WILLIAMSON, Oliver E. (1981): The Economics of Organizations: The Transaction Cost Approach. In: American Journal of Sociology (87): 548-577.
  39. SHERIF, Muzafer (1965): The Psychology of Social Norms. Octagon Books -New York.
  40. STERNBERG, Robert J; Jean E. PRETZ and James C. KAUFMAN (2003): Types of Innovation. In: SHAVININA, LITERATUR XXII Larisa V. (2003): The International Handbook on Innovation: 158-179. Elsevier Science Ltd. -Oxford.
  41. WEHNER, Theo; Christoph CLASES; Egon ENDRES und Arne RAEITHEL (1998): Zusammenarbeit als Ereignis und Prozess. In: SPIEß, Erika (1998): Formen der Koope- ration -Bedingungen und Perspektiven: 95-124.
  42. WENGER, Etienne (2008): Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press -Cambridge.
  43. UZZI, Brian (1997): Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. In: Administrative Science Quarterly (42): 35-67.


* Das Dokument ist im Internet frei zugänglich - Hinweise zu den Nutzungsrechten