Der Einfluss unterschiedlicher Provisorien auf den Komposit-Dentin-Verbund bei Komposit-Inlays

Einführung: In der vorliegenden Studie sollte überprüft werden, inwieweit sich der Einsatz unterschiedlicher provisorischer Zemente (UltraTemp®, Ultradent Products Inc., Utah, USA; Temp Bond™ und Temp Bond NE™, Kerr Hawe S.A., Bioggio, Schweiz) auf den Komposit-Dentin-Haftverbund bei Komposit-Inla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: Wickles, Larissa
Beteiligte: Frankenberger, Roland (Prof. Dr.) (BetreuerIn (Doktorarbeit))
Format: Dissertation
Veröffentlicht: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2015
Zahn-, Mund- u. Kieferheilkunde
Online Zugang:PDF-Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

1. Soares LES, do Espírito Santo AM, Brugnera A, Zanin FANA, Martin AA. Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation and manipulation treatments on dentin components, part 2: energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry study. J Biomed Opt 2009; 14(2): 24002.

2. BUONOCORE MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34(6): 849–853.

3. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent 2004; 32(3): 173–196.

4. Boyde A. Microstructure of enamel. Ciba Found Symp 1997; 205: 18-27.

5. Meryon SD, Jakeman KJ. Uptake of zinc and fluoride by several dentin components. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21(1): 127–135.

6. Cousins RJ, Dunn MA, Leinart AS, Yedinak KC, DiSilvestro RA. Coordinate regulation of zinc metabolism and metallothionein gene expression in rats. Am J Physiol 1986; 251 (1): E688-94.

7. Fornaini C, Riceputi D, Lupi-Pegurier L, Rocca JP. Patient responses to Er:YAG laser when used for conservative dentistry. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27(6): 1143–1149.

8. Holland GR. Morphological features of dentine and pulp related to dentine sensitivity. Arch Oral Biol 1994; 39 Suppl: 3S-11S.

9. Button GL, Moon PC, Barnes RF, Gunsolley JC. Effect of preparation cleaning procedures on crown retention. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59(2): 145–148.

10. Okamoto Y, Shintani H, Yamaki M. A medicated polycarboxylate cement to prevent complications in composite resin therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63(1): 37–40.

11. Markowitz K, Moynihan M, Liu M, Kim S. Biologic properties of eugenol and zinc oxide- eugenol. A clinically oriented review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 73(6): 729–737.

12. Walls AWG, Mccabe JF, Murray JJ. The Polymerization Contraction of Visible-Light Activated Composite Resins. J Dent 1988; 16: 177–181.

13. Jackson R. Esthetic inlays and onlays. Contemporary Esthetic Dentistry. Freedman G. editor, St. Louis: Elsevier 2012: 469-481.

14. Braly A, Darnell LA, Mann AB, Teaford MF, Weihs TP. The effect of prism orientation on the indentation testing of human molar enamel. Arch Oral Biol 2007; 52(9): 856–860.

15. Perdigão J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51(2): 333- 57.

16. Tuculină MJ, Răescu M, Dascălu IT, Popescu M, Andreescu CF, Dăguci C, Cumpâtâ CN, Nimigean VR, Banitâ IM. Indirect pulp capping in young patients: immunohistological study of pulp-dentin complex. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2013; 54(4): 1081–1086.

17. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 2004; 20(6): 579–585.

18. Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of layering methods,composite type, and flowable liner on polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured coposites. Dent Mater 2012; 28(7): 801-809.

19. Park HY, Kloxin CJ, Abuelyaman AS, Oxman JD, Bowman CN. Novel dental restorative materials having low polymerization shrinkage stress via stress relaxation by addition- fragmentation chain transfer. Dent Mater 2012; 28(11): 1113-1119.

20. Bottenberg P,Alaerts M, Keulemans F. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis- GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three- year results. J Dent 2007; 35(2): 163–171.

21. Takimoto M, Ishii R, Iino M, Shimizu Y, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, Ando S, Miyazaki M. Influence of temporary cement contamination on the surface free energy and dentine bond strength of self-adhesive cements. J Dent 2012; 40(2): 131–138.

22. Frese C, Schiller P, Staehle HJ, Wolff D. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2013; 41(11): 979–985.

23. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosà M, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Pashley DH, Tay F, Breschi L. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-Year in vitro study. J Dent 2013; 10: 1016-12.008.

24. Topographical, diametral, and quantitative analysis of dentin tubules in the root canals of human and bovine teeth. J Endod 2007; 33(4): 422–426.

25. Bester SP, de Wet FA, Nel JC, Driessen CH. The effect of airborne particle abrasion on the dentin smear layer and dentin: an in vitro investigation. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8(1): 46–50.

26. Bleicher F. Odontoblast physiology. Exp Cell Res 2013; 10: 1016-12.012.

27. Schilke R, Lisson JA, Bauss O, Geurtsen W. Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45(5): 355–361.

28. Lewinstein I, Chweidan H, Matalon S, Pilo R. Retention and marginal leakage of provisional crowns cemented with provisional cements enriched with chlorhexidine diacetate. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98(5): 373–378.

29. Frankenberger R, Perdigão J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001; 17(5): 373–380.

30. Kwong SM, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Itthagarun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro- tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 2002; 18(5): 359–369.

31. Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Eick JD. Microtensile testing of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1998; 14(3): 194–201.

32. Toparli M, Aksoy T. Fracture toughness determination of composite resin and dentin/composite resin adhesive interfaces by laboratory testing and finite element models. Dent Mater 1998; 14(4): 287–293.

33. Ozok AR, Wu M-K, Wesselink PR. Comparison of the in vitro permeability of human dentine according to the dentinal region and the composition of the simulated dentinal fluid. J Dent 2002; 30(2-3): 107–111.

34. Figueiredo Reis A, Giannini M, Ambrosano GMB, Chan DCN. The effects of filling techniques and a low-viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities. J Dent 2003; 31(1): 59–66.

35. Leirskar J, Nordbø H. The effect of zinc oxide-eugenol on the shear bond strength of a commonly used bonding system. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16(6): 265–268.

36. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bonding of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8(1): 31–34.

37. Manhart J, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84(3): 289–296.

38. Schmalz G, Hoffmann M, Weis K, Schweikl H. Influence of albumin and collagen on the cell mortality evoked by zinc oxide-eugenol in vitro. J Endod 2000; 26(5): 284–287.

39. Paul SJ, Schärer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24(1): 8–14.

40. Han JM, Lin H, Zheng G, Shinya A, Gomi H, Shinya A, Lin J. Effect of nanofiller on wear resistance and surface roughness of resin composites. Chin J Dent Res 2012; 15(1): 41–47.

41. Smith DC. A new dental cement. Br Dent J 1968; 124(9): 381–384.

42. Boroujeni PM, Mousavinasab SM, Hasanli E. Effect of configuration factor on gap formation in hybrid composite resin, low-shrinkage composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer. J Investig Clin Dent 2014; 10: 1111-12.082.

43. Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010; 89(6): 549-560.

44. Smith AJ, Murray PE, Sloan AJ, Matthews JB, Zhao S. Trans-dentinal stimulation of tertiary dentinogenesis. Adv Dent Res 2001; 15: 51–54.

45. Gray GB, Carey GPD, Jagger DC. An in vitro investigation of a comparison of bond strengths of composite to etched and air-abraded human enamel surfaces. J Prosthodont 2006; 15(1): 2–8.

46. Shilling G. Permanency of EBA cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1977; 95(2): 187, 189.

47. Jakow R, Barr DB, Barr JR, Calafat AM, Needham LL, Rubin C. Exposure to bisphenol A from bis-glycidyl dimetharylate-based sealants. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(3): 353-362.

48. Manuja N, Nagpal R, Pandit IK. Dental adhesion: mechanism, techniques and durability.

49. Lin J, Kern M, Ge J, Zhu J, Wang H, Vollrath O, Mehl Ch. Influence of peripheral enamel bonding and chlorhexidine pretreatment on resin bonding to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15(4): 351–359.

50. Wang W, Sun X, Huang L, Gao Y, Ban J, Shen L, Chen J. Structure property relationship in hybrid dental nanocomposite resins containing monufunctional and multifunctional polyhedral oligomerie silsesquioxanes. Int J Nanomedicine 2014; 9: 841-852.

51. Kanakuri K, Kawamoto Y, Matsumura H. Influence of temporary cement remnant and surface cleaning method on bond strength to dentin of a composite luting system. J Oral Sci 2005; 47(1): 9–13.

52. Miyazaki M, Tsujimoto A, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa HA, Platt J. Important compositional characteristics in the clinical use of adhesive systems. J Appl Oreal Sci 2010; 18(3): 207-14.

53. Mcleod ME, Price RBT, Felix CM. Effect of configuration factor on shear bond strengths of self-etch adhesive systems to ground enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2010; 35(1): 84-93.

54. Chang YE, Shin DH. Effect of chlorhexidine application methods on microtensile bond strength to dentin in Class I cavities. Oper Dent 2010; 35(6): 618–623.

55. Santos MJMC, Bapoo H, Rizkalla AS, Santos GC. Effect of dentin-cleaning techniques on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin. Oper Dent 2011; 36(5): 512–520.

56. Cetin AR, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N. A five-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Oper Dent 2013; 38(2): E1-11.

57. Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio Ad. Immediate Adhesive Properties to Dentin and Enamel of a Universal Adhesive Associated With a Hydrophobic Resin Coat. Oper Dent 2013; 10: 234-253.

58. Miyasaka T, Yoshida T. Effect of binary and ternary filler mixture on the mechanical properties of composite resins. Dent Mater J 2000; 19(3): 229-244.

59. Gao BT, Lin H, Zheng G, Xu YX, Yang JL. Comparison between a silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composites: shrinkage characteristics, thermal properties, gel point and vitrification point. Dent Mater J 2012; 31(1): 76–85.

60. Cetin AR, Unlu N. One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Dent Mater J 2009; 28(5): 620–626.

61. Desai P, Das UK. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite:an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2011; 22(6): 877.

62. Kalra S, Singh A, Gupta M, Chadha V. Ormocer:An aesthetic direct restorative material; An in vitro study comparing the marginal sealing ability of organically modified ceramics and a hybrid composite using an ormocer-based bonding agent and a conventional fith-generation bonding agent. Contemp Clin Dent 2012; 3(1): 48-53

63. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3- year results. Am J Dent 1992; 5(5): 258–262.

64. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R. Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion. Quintessence Int 2001; 32: 700-706.

65. Fornaini C. Er:YAG and adhesion in conservative dentistry. Clinical overview. Laser Ther 2013; 22(1): 31–35.

66. Geurtsen W, García-Godoy F. Bonded restorations for the prevention and treatment of the cracked-tooth syndrome. Am J Dent 1999; 12(6): 266–270.

67. Terata R, Nakashima K, Kubota M. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth. Am J Dent 2000; 13(4): 209–211.

68. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 2002; 33(3): 213-24.

69. Kanca J. 3 rd Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 213-215.

70. Pashley DH. In vitro simulations of in vivo bonding conditions. Am J Dent 1991b; 4(5): 237–240.

71. Mamaladze MT, Ustiashvili MG. Theoretical and practical principles of dentinogenesis: hypotheses and confirmed clinically reality. Georgian Med News 2010; 186: 22–28.

72. Suyama Y, Lührs AK, Munck Jd, Mine A, Poitevin A, Yamada T, Van Meerbeek B, Cardoso MV. Potential smear layer interference with bonding of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15(4): 317–324.

73. Pieper K, Lange J, Jablonski-Momeni A, Schulte AG. Caries prevalence in 12-year-old children from Germany: results of the 2009 national survey. Community Dent Health 2013; 30(3): 138–142.

74. Groot Rde, Peters MC, Plasschaert AJ, Ensink Op Kemna GJ. Cohesive and adhesive fracture patterns of the composite-enamel bond. J Biol Buccale 1985; 13(1): 63–71.

75. Burke EJ, Qualtrough AJ. Aesthetic inlays: composite or ceramic? Br Dent J 1994; 176(2): S. 53–60.

76. Burrow M. Understanding adhesive dentistry. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg 2010; 20: 75–79.

77. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Ciucchi B, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesives. J Dent Res 1995; 74(10): 1679–1688.

78. Nikaido T, Kataumi M, Burrow MF, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Bond strengths of resin to enamel and dentin treated with low-pressure air abrasion. Oper Dent 1996; 21(5): 218–224.

79. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2000; 16(3): 180–187.

80. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1998; 14(3): 212–221.

81. Silvey RG, Myers GE. Clinical study of dental cements. VI. A study of zinc phosphate, EBA-reinforced zinc oxide eugenol and polyacrylic acid cements as luting agents in fixed prostheses. J Dent Res 1977; 56(10): 1215–1218.

82. Viljanen EK, Skrifvars M, Vallittu PK. Dendritic copolymers and particulate filler composites for dental applications: Degree of conversion and thermal properties. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1420–7.

83. Pallav P, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL, Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. The influence of admixing microfiller to small-particle composite resin on wear, tensile strength, hardness, and surface roughness. J Dent Res 1989; 68(3): 489–490.

84. Tosun G, Sener Y, Sengun A. Effect of storage duration/solution on microshear bond strength of composite to enamel. Dent Mater J 2007; 26(1): 116–121.

85. Ilie N, Jelen E, Clementino-Luedemann T, Hickel R. Low shrinkage composite for dental application. Dent Mater J 2007; 26(2): 149-155.

86. Terata R. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement--study on removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J 1993; 12(1): 18–28.

87. Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J, Nishitani Y, Yamada T, Itou K, Carvalho RM, Nakajima M, Pashley DH. Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res 2002; 81(8): 556–560.

88. Leloup JM, Serraj S, Pauvert B, Térol A, Cluzel B, Margerit J. Chemical characterization of in vivo aged zinc polycarboxylate dental cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998; 9(9): 493–496.

89. Abb. 13: Komposit-Inlays hergestellt-Eigenfoto

90. Abb. 1 : Inkrementtechnik (Frankenberger 2010-Adhäsiv-Fibel, S.102)

91. Larsen-Basse J. Abrasive wear of ceramics. Friction and wear of ceramics, Jahanmir S, editor, Marcel Dekker,New York 1994: 99-115.

92. Frankenberger R. Adhäsiv-Fibel. Adhäsive Zahnmedizin -Wege zum klinischen Erfolg. 2. überarb. u. erw. Aufl. Balingen: Spitta-Verl. (Spitta-Abrechung) 2010.

93. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bambi C, Grandini R. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7(4): 79–88.

94. Fleisch AF, Sheffield PE, Chinn C, Edelstein BL, Landrigan PJ. Bisphenol A and related compounds in dental materials. Pediatrics 2010; 126(4): 760-768.

95. Roeder LB, Berry EA, You C, Powers JM. Bond strength of composite to air-abraded enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 1995; 20(5): 186–190.

96. Droschl HH, Wendl B. Comparison of bond strength using various fixation methods. World J Orthod 2007; 8(2): 153–156.

97. Sachin B. Comparison of retention of provisional crowns cemented with temporary cements containing stannous fluoride and sodium fluoride-an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013; 13(4): 541–545.

98. Meiers JC, Shook LW. Effect of disinfectants on the bond strength of composite to dentin. Am J Dent 1996; 9(1): 11–14.

99. Ganss C, Jung M. Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 1998; 23(2): 55–62.

100. Brännström M. Etiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992; 88(1): 7–13.

101. Davidson CL, Davidson-Kaban SS. Handling of mechanical stresses in composite restorations. Dent Update 1998; 25(7): 274–279.

102. Haller B, Thull R, Klaiber B, Schmitz A. Höckerstabilisierung durch Adhäsivinlays in MOD- Kavitaten. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1990; 45(10): 660–663.

103. Dickerson WG, Hastings JH. Indirect composite restorations. Curr Opin Cosmet Dent 1995; 51–56.

104. Nandini S. Indirect resin composite. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13(4): 184-194.

105. Fonseca RB, Martins LRM, Quagliatto PS, Soares CJ. Influence of provisional cements on ultimate bond strength of indirect composite restorations to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7(3): 225–230.

106. Goracci C, Rengo C, Eusepi L, Juloski J, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Influence of selective enamel etching on the bonding effectiveness of a new "all-in-one" adhesive. Am J Dent 2013; 26(2): 99–104.

107. Zheng T, Huang C, Zhang Z, Wang S, Zhang G. Influence of storage methods on microtensile bond strength of dentin adhesive system. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2005; 14(2): 147–150.

108. Abb. 14: Inlay-Komposit Venus®Diamond PLT Refill ( " " )

109. Abb. 8: Klassifikation der Bondingsysteme (Heinrich F. Kappert, Karl Eichner 2008- Zahnärztliche Werkstoffe und ihre Verarbeitung, S. 159)

110. Oilo G. Luting cements: a review and comparison. Int Dent J 1991; 41(2): 81–88.

111. Eldiwany M, Powers JM, George LA. Mechanical properties of direct and post-cured composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 222–4.

112. Shimada Y, Kikushima D, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of resin-bonding systems to cervical enamel. Am J Dent 2002; 15(6): 373–377.

113. Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobbb DS. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4(2): 115–124.

114. Magloire H, Romeas A, Melin M, Couble ML, Bleicher F, Farges JC. Molecular regulation of odontoblast activity under dentin injury. Adv Dent Res 2001; 15: 46–50.

115. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. FDI Commission Project. Int Dent J 1998; 48(1): 3-16.

116. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion.

117. O´Brien WJ. Phenolate-Based cements in Dental materials and their selection. 3 rd editor, Chicago: Quintessence 2002: 139.

118. Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Porcelain and Composite inlays and onlays. Illinois. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 1994: 117–33.

119. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994; 10(4): 236–240.

120. Abb. 7: REM-Bild: Angeschnittenes geätztes Dentin (www.zahnarzt-

121. El-din AKN, Miller BH, Griggs JA. Resin bonding to sclerotic, noncarious, Quintessence Int 2004; 35(7): 529–540.

122. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. 11 th editor,St. Louis: Mosby, 2002: 594-634.

123. Lewinstein I, Fuhrer N, Gelfand K, Cardash H, Pilo R. Retention, marginal leakage, and cement solubility of provisional crowns cemented with temporary cement containing stannous fluoride. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16(2): 189–193.

124. Olin PS, Rudney JD, Hill EM. Retentive strength of six temporary dental cements. Quintessence Int 1990; 21(3): 197–200.

125. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent 2008; 10(5): 339–344.

126. Ozer F, Blatz MB. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013; 34(1): 12-4, 16, 18; quiz 20, 30.

127. Couve E, Osorio R, Schmachtenberg O. The amazing odontoblast: activity, autophagy, and aging. J Dent Res 2013; 92(9): 765–772.

128. Meyerowitz JM, Rosen M, Cohen J, Becker PJ. The effect of eugenol containing and non- eugenol temporary cements on the resin-enamel bond. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1994; 49(8): 389– 392.

129. Reis AF, Oliveira MT, Giannini M, De Goes MF, Rueggeberg FA. The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives bond strength to enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2003; 23: 700-706.

130. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1(4): 299–309.

131. Lee JJ, Nettey-Marbell A, Cook A, Pimenta LAF, Leonard R, Ritter AV. Using extracted teeth for research: the effect of storage medium and sterilization on dentin bond strengths. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138(12): 1599–1603.

132. Omae M, Shinnou Y, Tanaka K, Abo T, Nakata T, Suzuki K, Hatsuoka Y, Iwata N, Yoshikawa K, Nishitani Y, Yamamoto K, Yoshiyama M. XPS analysis of the dentin irradiated by Er: YAG laser. Dent Mater J 2009; 28(4): 471–476.

133. Happert HF, Eichner K. Zahnärztliche Werkstoffe und ihre Verarbeitung. Werkstoffe unter klinischen Aspekten. 6. vollst. überarb. u. erw. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme 2008.

134. Helvey GA. Adhesive dentistry: the developments of immediate dentin sealing/selective etching bonding techniques. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011; 32(9): 22, 24-32, 34-5.

135. Wilson AD. The nature of the zinc polycarboxylate cement matrix. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16(5): 549-57.

136. Carvalho CN, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of ZOE temporary restoration on resin-dentin bond strength using different adhesive strategies. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19(3): 144-52.

137. Hill EE, Lott J. A clinically focussed discussion of luting materials. Dent J 2011; 56(1): 67- 76.

138. Guéders AM, Charpentier JF, Albert AI, Geerts SO. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining. Oper Dent 2006; 31(4): 450–455.

139. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater 2010; 26(2): e78-93.

140. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A prospective clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays: ten-year results. Quintessence Int 2006; 37(2): 139–144.

141. Silva e Souza MH, Carneiro KGK, Lobato MF, Silva e Souza PdAR, de Góes MF. Adhesive systems: important aspects related to their composition and clinical use. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18(3): 207–214.

142. Yap AUJ, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC. Influence of ZOE temporary restorations on microleakage in composite restorations. Oper Dent 2002; 27(2): 142–146.

143. Rahal V, Briso ALF, dos Santos PH, Sundefeld MLMM, Sundfeld RH. Influence of the hybrid layer thickness and resin tag length on microtensile bond strength. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2011; 24(1): 8–14.

144. Terry DA, Touati B. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/ onlay restorations: a review. Pract Proced Aesthetic Dent 2001; 13(1): 51-8.

145. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Taschner M, Petschelt A, Nikolaenko SA. Adhesive luting revisited: influence of adhesive, temporary cement, cavity cleaning, and curing mode on internal dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9 Suppl 2: 269–273.

146. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 29(5): 481–508.

147. Chiba Y, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Moore BK. Effect of air- drying time of single-application self-etch adhesives on dentin bond strength. Oper Dent 2006; 31(2): 233–239.

148. Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC. The effects of tooth preparation cleansing protocols on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to contaminated dentin. Oper Dent 2008; 33(5): 556–563.

149. Fligor J. Preparation design and considerations for direct posterior composite inlay/ onlay restoration. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2008; 20(7): 413-9.

150. Niu LN, Zhang W, Pashley DH, Breschi L, Mao J, Chen JH, Tay FR. Biomimetic remineralization of dentin. Dent Mater 2014; 30(1): 77–96.

151. Cramer NB, Stransbury JW, Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res 2011; 90(4): 402-416.

152. Husar B, Moszner N, Lukac I. Synthesis and photooxidation of styrene copolymer bearing camphorquinone pendant groups. Beilstein J Org Chem 2012; 8: 337-343.

153. Oltra D, Gay-Escoda C. A prospective clinical study of polycarboxylate cement in periapical surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17(2): e276-80.

154. Zortuk M, Gumus HO, Kilinc HI, Tuncdemir AR. Effect of different provisional cement remnant cleaning procedures including Er:YAG laser on shear bond strength of ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2012; 4(4): 192–196.

155. Nahid A, Zahra BG, Yasaman R. Evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealant. Contemp Clin Dent 2012; 3(4): 380–382.

156. Hopp CD, Land MF. Considerations for ceramic-inlays in posterior teeth: a review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2013; 18(5): 21-32.

157. Ülker HE, Ülker M, Gümüs HÖ, Yalçın M, Şengün A. Cytotoxicity testing of temporary luting cements with two-and three-dimensional cultures of bovine dental pulp-derived cells. Biomed Res Int 2013; 910459.

158. Mishra MK, Prakash S. A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between hand instrument, ultrasonic scaling and erbium doped:Yttirum aluminum garnet laser on root surface: A morphological and thermal analysis. Contemp Clin Dent 2013; 4(2): 198–205.

159. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27(1): 1–16.

160. Ilday NO, Celik N, Dilsiz A, Alp HH, Aydin T, Seven N, Kiziltunc A. The effects of silorane composites on levels of cytokines and periodontal parameters. Contemp Clin Dent 2013; 4(4): 437-442.

161. Rotta M, Bresciani P, Moura SK, Grande RHM, Hilgert LA, Baratieri LN, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effects of phosphoric acid pretreatment and substitution of bonding resin on bonding effectiveness of self-etching systems to enamel. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9(6): 537–545.

162. Mjör IA. Dentin permeability: the basis for understanding pulp reactions and adhesive technology. Braz Dent J 2009; 20(1): 3–16.

163. Santana IL, Lodovici E, Matos JR, Medeiros IS, Miyazaki CL, Rodrigues-Filho LE.Effect of Experimental Heat Treatment on Mechanical Properties of Resin Composites. Braz Dent J 2009; 20: 205–10.

164. Lenzi TL, Tedesco TK, Soares FZM, Loguercio AD, Rocha RdO. Chlorhexidine does not increase immediate bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive to caries-affected dentin of primary and permanent teeth. Braz Dent J 2012; 23(4): 438–442.

165. Mash LK, Beninger CK, Bullard JT, Staffanou RS. Leakage of various types of luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66(6): 763–766.

166. Pashley DH. Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991a; 66(6): 777–781.

167. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991; 7(2): 107–113.

168. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: Properties and fractography. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 290–5.

169. Eick JD, Byerley TJ, Chappell RP,Chen GR, Bowles CQ, Chappelow CC. Properties of expanding SOC/epoxy copolymers for dental composites. Dent Mater 1993; 9(2): 123-127.

170. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995; 11(2): 117–125.

171. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Kulunk T. Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94(4): 363–369.

172. Gerosa R, Borin M, Menegazzi G, Puttini M, Cavalleri G. In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of pure eugenol. J Endod 1996; 22(10): 532–534.

173. Park Y, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: Incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater 2008; 24(11): 1501-1505.

174. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Kimmes NS. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre- etched enamel. Dent Mater 2009; 25(10): 1187–1194.

175. van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 2000; 28(5): 299–306.

176. Ribeiro JCV, Coelho PG, Janal MN, Silva NRFA, Monteiro AJ, Fernandes CAO. The influence of temporary cements on dental adhesive systems for luting cementation. J Dent 2011; 39(3): 255–262.

177. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart polymerization' . J Dent 1997; 25: 321–30.

178. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 1997; 25(6): 441–458.

179. Fujisawa S, Kashiwagi Y, Atsumi T, Iwakura I, Ueha T, Hibino Y, Yokoe I. Application of bis- eugenol to a zinc oxide eugenol cement. J Dent 1999; 27(4): 291–295.

180. Saleh F, Taymour N. Validity of using bovine teeth as a substitute for human counterparts in adhesive tests. East Mediterr Health J 2003; 9(1-2): 201–207.

181. Santana FR, Pereira JC, Pereira CA, Fernandes Neto AJ, Soares CJ. Influence of method and period of storage on the microtensile bond strength of indirect composite resin restorations to dentine. Braz Oral Res 2008; 22(4): 352–357.

182. da Costa LRdRS, Watanabe IS, Kronka MC. Coronal dentinal tubules of non-erupted deciduous incisors. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2002; 16(1): 12–17.

183. [41] de-Melo MAS, Goes DdC, de-Moraes MDR, Santiago SL, Rodrigues LKA. Effect of chlorhexidine on the bond strength of a self-etch adhesive system to sound and demineralized dentin. Braz Oral Res 2013; 27(3): 218–224.

184. Cunha LG, Alonso RCB, Santos PHD, Sinhoreti MAC. Comparative study of the surface roughness of Ormocer-based and conventional composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2003; 11(4): 348- 353.

185. Topaloglu-Ak A, Onçağ O, Gökçe B, Bent B. The effect of different enamel surface treatments on microleakage of fissure sealants. Acta Med Acad 2013; 42(2): 223–228.

186. Thanatvarakorn O, Nakajima M, Prasansuttiporn T, Ichinose S, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of smear layer deproteinizing on resin-dentine interface with self-etch adhesive. J Dent 2013; 10: 1016-1026.

187. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 128–137.