Phylogenetic community structure of ants in secondary forests in Brazil

2.1 DNA sequencing is increasingly being used to assist in species identification in order to overcome taxonomic impediment. However, few studies attempt to compare the results of these molecular studies with a more traditional species delineation approach based on morphological characters. We sequ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Nyoike, Rossa Ng´endo
Beteiligte: Brandl, Roland (Prof. Dr.) (BetreuerIn (Doktorarbeit))
Format: Dissertation
Veröffentlicht: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2011
Online Zugang:PDF-Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

1. Oliver, I., Nally, R.M. & York, A. 2000. Identifying performance indicators of the effects of forest management on ground-active arthropod biodiversity using hierarchical partitioning and partial canonical correspondence analysis. Forest Ecology and Management 139: 21–40.

2. Didham, R.K., Ghazoul. J., Stork, N.E. & Davis, A.J. 1996. Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. TREE 11: 255-260.

3. Gotelli, N.J. & Rohde, K. 2002. Co-occurrence of ectoparasites of marine fishes: a null model analysis. Ecology Letters 5: 86–94.

4. Brady, S.G., Schultz, T.R., Fisher, B.L. & Ward, P.S. 2006. Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 103: 18172-18177.

5. Matthews, L.J., Tehrani, J.J., Jordan, F.M., Collard, M. & Nunn, C.L. 2011. Testing for Divergent Transmission Histories among Cultural Characters: A Study Using Bayesian Phylogenetic Methods and Iranian Tribal Textile Data. Public library of Science ONE 6: e14810.

6. Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. 1996. Microclimatic changes and indirect loss of ant diversity in a tropical agroecosystem. Oecologia 108: 577–582.

7. 1999 September-2003 October Bachelors of Education Science at Kenyatta University. 1994-1997 High School Education at Don Bosco Girls Secondary. Other studies 14 th -21 st September 2005 GIS Beginners Course at National Museums of Kenya. Work experience 2006-2007 Voluntary attachment at the National Museums of Kenya (NMK) Department of Herpetology. 2003-2004 High school teacher (Biology and Chemistry) at Don Bosco Girls.

8. Andersen, A.N. 1995. A classification of Australian ant communities based on functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance. Journal of Biogeography 22:15-29.

9. Pacheco, R., Silva, R.R., Morini, M. & Brandão, C.R. 2009. A Comparison of the Leaf- Litter Ant Fauna in a Secondary Atlantic Forest with an Adjacent Pine Plantation in Southeastern Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 38: 055-065.

10. Hendy, M.D. & Penny, D. 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Systematic Zoology 38:297-309.

11. Colwell, R.K., & Winkler, D.W. 1984. A null model for null models in biogeography. Pages 344–359 in D.R. Strong, D. Simberloff, L.G. Abele, and A.B. Thistle, editors. Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

12. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289-290.

13. Tofts, R. & Silvertown. J. 2000. A phylogenetic approach to community assembly from a local species pool. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267:363–369.

14. Floren, A., Biun, A. & Linsenmair, K.E. 2002. Arboreal ants as key predators in tropical lowland rainforest trees. Oecologia 131: 137–144.

15. Chung, A.Y.C. 1995. Cammon Lowland RainForest Ants of Sabah, The Borneo Nature Series 1, Forestry Departement, Sabah, 3-7.

16. Osorio-Pérez, K., Barberena-Arias, M.F. & Aide, T.M. 2007. Changes in Ant Species Richness and Composition during Plant Secondary Succession in Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science 43: 244-253.

17. Ng'endo, R., Bihn, J.H., Opgenoorth, L., Braendle, M. & Brandl, R. (2011) Determinants of phylogenetic community structure of ant communities along a forest succession gradient. Accepted for (poster presentation) GfOe 2011 in Oldenburg, Germany.

18. Ng'endo, R., Bihn, J.H. & Brandl, R. (2010) DNA barcoding as a method for species identification in the hyper-diverse ant genus Pheidole. – in Verhandlungen der gesellschaft für Ökologie (GfÖ), Band 40. 40 th Anniversary Conference in Giessen. (Poster).

19. Floren, A. & Linsenmair, K.E. 2000. Do ant mosaics exist in pristine lowland rain forest? Oecologia 123:129–137.

20. Bihn, J.H., Verhaagh, M., Brändle, M. & Brandl. R. 2008b. Do secondary forests act as refuges for old-growth forest animals? Recovery of ant diversity in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Biological Conservation 141: 733-743.

21. Bihn, J.H., Verhaagh, M. & Brandl, R. 2008a. Ecological Stoichiometry along a Gradient of Forest Succession: Bait Preferences of Litter Ants. Biotropica. 40: 597-599.

22. Pineda, F.D., Nicolás, J.P., Pou, A. & Galiano, E.F. 1981 Ecological succession in oligotrophic pastures of Central Spain. Vegetatio 44: 165–176. Determinants of Phylogenetic Community Structure

23. Vamosi, S.M., Heard, S.B., Vamosi, J.C. & Webb, C.O. 2009. Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Molecular Ecology 18: 572-592.

24. Webb, C.O. 2000. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. American Naturalist 156:145–155. Determinants of Phylogenetic Community Structure

25. Carvalho, K.S. & Vasconcelos, H.L. 1999. Forest fragmentation in central Amazonia and its effects on litter-dwelling ants. Biological Conservation 20: 151–157.

26. Rockwood, L. & Glander, K. 1979. Howling monkeys and leaf-cutting ants: comparative foraging in a tropical deciduous forest. Biotropica 11: 1–10.

27. Proches, S., Wilson, J.R.U. & Cowling, R.M. 2006. How much evolutionary history in a 10x10 m plot? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273: 1143–1148.

28. Cavender-Bares, J. & Wilczek, A. 2003. Integrating micro-and macroevolutionary processes in community ecology. Ecology 84: 592–597.

29. Kaspari, M. 1996. Litter ant patchiness at 1-m2 scale: Disturbance dynamics in three Neotropical forests. Oecologia 107: 265–273. Determinants of Phylogenetic Community Structure Kaspari, M. & Weiser, M.D. 2000. Ant activity along moisture gradients in a Neotropical Forest. Biotropica 32: 703–711.

30. Campos, R.B.F., Schoereder, J.H. & Sperber, C.F. 2003. Local determinants of species richness in litter ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidade). Sociobiology 4: 357- 367.

31. Chong, C-S. Hoffmann, A.A & Thomson, L.J. 2010. Local-scale spatial dynamics of ants in a temperate agroecosystem. Austral Ecology DOI: 10.1111/j.1442- 9993.2010.02155.x Determinants of Phylogenetic Community Structure

32. Torres, J. A. & Medina-Gaud, S. 1998. Los insectos de Puerto Rico. Acta Científ 12:3-41.

33. Bihn, J.H., Gebaurer, G. & Brandl. R. 2010. Loss of functional diversity of ant assemblages in secondary tropical forests. Ecology 91: 782-792.

34. Shik, J.Z. & Kaspari, M. 2010. More food, less habitat: how necromass and leaf litter decomposition combine to regulate a litter ant community. Ecological Entomology 35: 158-165.

35. Ng'endo, R., Kairu, E. & Ogol, C.P.K. Morphological taxonomy as a tool for diversity assessment of Ridged Frogs (Genus Ptychadena) in Eastern Arc Mountains -Taita Hills, Kenya. Acta Herpetologica, submitted.

36. Torres, J.A. 1984. Niches coexistence of ant communities in Puerto Rico: Repeated Patterns. Biotropica 16: 284–295.

37. Gotelli, N.J. 2000. Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81: 2606–2621.

38. Fittkau, E.J. & Klinge, H. 1973. On biomass and trophic structure of the central Amazonian rain forest ecosystem. Biotropica 5: 2–14.

39. Cavender-Bares, J., Ackerly, D.D., Baum, D.A. & Bazzaz, F.A. 2004. Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. American Naturalist 163: 823-843.

40. Cavender-Bares, J., Keen, A. & Miles, B. 2006. Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology 87: S109-S122.

41. Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D., McPeek, M.A. & Donoghue, M.J. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 475–505.

42. Swofford, D.L. & Olsen, G.J. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. Pages 411-501 in Molecular systematics, 1st edition (D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

43. Schneider, D.C. 1994. Quantitative ecology: spatial and temporal scaling. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. 238 p.

44. Menge, B.A. & Olson, A.M. 2003. Role of scale and environmental factors in regulation of community structure. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5: 52-57.

45. Helmus, M., Savage, K., Diebel, M., Maxted, J. & Ives, A. 2007. Separating the determinants of phylogenetic community structure. Ecological Letters 10: 917–925.

46. Zorilla, J.M., Serrano, J.M., Casado, M.A., Acosta, F.J. & Pineda, F.D. 1986. Structural characteristics of an ant community during succession. Oikos 47: 346–354. Summary References Rogeria Stenamma Bolton 2003

47. Submitted Papers:

48. Gotelli, N.J. & Entsminger, G.L. 2003. Swap algorithms in null model analysis. Ecology 84:532–535.

49. Gotelli, N.J. & Entsminger, G.L. 2001. Swap and fill algorithms in null model analysis: rethinking the Knight's Tour. Oecologia 129: 281–291.

50. Connor, E.F. & Simberloff, D. 1979. The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60: 1132–1140.

51. Rico-Gray, V. & Oliveira, P.S. 2007. The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 331 p.

52. McGlynn, T.P., & Kirksey, S.E. 2000. The effects of food presentation and microhabitat upon resourse monopoly in a ground-foraging ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) community. Revista de Biologia Tropical 48: 629–642.

53. Wilson, E.O. 1971. The insect societes. Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. Cambridge, MA.

54. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences 326: 119–157.

55. Kembel, S. & Hubbell, S.P. 2006. The phylogenetic structure of a neotropical forest tree community. Ecology 87: 86-99.

56. Swenson, N.G., Enquist, B.J., Pither, J., Thompson, J. & Zimmerman, J.K. 2006. The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. Ecology 87: 2418-2424.

57. Levin, S.A. 1992. The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H.

58. Austin, M.P. 1977. Use of ordination and other multivariate descriptive methods to study succession. Vegetatio 35: 165–175.

59. Kembel, S.W. et al. 2008. Picante: phylocom integration, community analyses, null- models, traits and evolution in R v. 0.2-0.

60. Chazdon, R.I., Careaga, S., Webb, C. & Vargas, O. 2003. Community and phylogenetic structure of reproductive traits of woody species in wet tropical forests. Ecological monographs 73:331–348.

61. Letcher, S.G. 2010. Tropical forest succession phylogenetic structure of angiosperm communities during tropical forest succession. Proceedings of royal society of B. 277: 97-104.

62. Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial Scaling in Ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385-397.

63. Ng'endo, R., Bihn, J.H. & Brandl, R. DNA barcodes for species identification in the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Journal of Insect Science, submitted.

64. Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D. & Kembel, S.W. 2008. Phylocom: Software for the Analysis of Community Phylogenetic Structure and Trait Evolution, Version 4.0.1. Available from URL:

65. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.