Stellenwert der kernspintomografischen Repositionskontrolle der kindlichen Hüftluxation

Einleitung: Seit der Einführung der Magnetresonanztomografie (MRT) in die Diagnostik der kongenitalen Hüftgelenkluxation in den 1980er Jahren wird dieses Verfahren aufgrund seiner hohen Sensitivität in der Weichteil- und Knorpeldarstellung mit als das bildgebende Verfahren der Wahl bei der Stellungs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Warda, Cornelia
Contributors: Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne (Prof. Dr.) (Thesis advisor)
Format: Dissertation
Language:German
Published: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2008
Orthopädie und Rheumatologie
Subjects:
CDH
MRI
Online Access:PDF Full Text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents: Background: Since magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been introduced as diagnostic parameter for congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) in the 1980ies, it is considered to be the preferred method of imaging to control hip repositioning. The aim of this study was to investigate the advantage of using MRI in comparison to X-rays after reposition of CDH with special attention to the incidence of redislocation in the course of treatment. With no special classifications to evaluate hips on MR images existing, we developed one for each plane. Methods: To develop the new classifications, 117 MR images were evaluated. Three independent investigators applied the classifications twice. Intra- and inter-observer reliability and alpha reliability coefficient were calculated for both classifications. Within the observed group different imaging (radiography or MRI) was correlated with items of therapy and follow-up, with special regard to redislocation. Pearsons coefficient was calculated and considered significant when α > 0.7 and p < 0.05. Results: The evaluation of the newly developed classifications showed an intra-observer reliability up to 82.4% accordance for coronal MR images and up to 87.5% for transversal images. Inter-observer reliabilitiy revealed for coronal images α = 0.7878 and for transversal images α = 0.7307. The evaluation of correlations between imaging and aspects of therapy and follow-up did not show any significance. With regard to the diagnosis of redislocation pelvigraphy and coronal MRI showed no advantage, but transversal imaging, using the new classification, could reveal by then undiagnosed anteroposterior redislocation. Conclusions: We propose an algorithm for the use of MRI within CDH repositioning control: Balancing the risks of sedation and ionizing radiation, the sedation used for reposition should be used for subsequent MR imaging. If no pathological findings are found in either plane subsequent imaging controls should be performed by radiography. If pathologies are identified, reposition has to be repeated as well as MRI. In case of no pathological findings, imaging should be performed by radiography.