Motivate the Crowd or Crowd-them out? The Impact of Local Government spending on the Voluntary Provision of a Green Public Good

Cities are increasingly hold accountable for climate action. By demonstrating their pro-environmentality through own climate-related activities, they not at least aspire to encourage individual climate protection efforts. Based on standard economic theory there is little reason to assume that this i...

全面介紹

Gespeichert in:
書目詳細資料
發表在:MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 33-2022)
Autoren: Bartels, Lara, Kesternich, Martin
格式: Artikel
語言:英语
出版: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2022
主題:
在線閱讀:PDF-Volltext
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
實物特徵
總結:Cities are increasingly hold accountable for climate action. By demonstrating their pro-environmentality through own climate-related activities, they not at least aspire to encourage individual climate protection efforts. Based on standard economic theory there is little reason to assume that this is a promising strategy. Financed by taxpayers’ money, cities’ contributions are considered as substitutes that crowd-out private contributions to the same public good. Inspired by research on providing information on reference group behavior, we challenge this argument and conduct a framed-field experiment to analyze the impact of reference group information on the voluntary provision of a green public good. We investigate whether information on previous contributions by fellow citizens or the city affect individual contributions. We do not find statistical evidence that city-level information crowds-out additional individual contributions. A reference to fellow citizens significantly increases the share of contributors as it attracts subjects that are not per-se pro-environmentally oriented.
實物描述:35 Seiten
ISSN:1867-3678
DOI:10.17192/es2024.0740