Motivate the Crowd or Crowd-them out? The Impact of Local Government spending on the Voluntary Provision of a Green Public Good
Cities are increasingly hold accountable for climate action. By demonstrating their pro-environmentality through own climate-related activities, they not at least aspire to encourage individual climate protection efforts. Based on standard economic theory there is little reason to assume that this i...
Gespeichert in:
發表在: | MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 33-2022) |
---|---|
Autoren: | , |
格式: | Artikel |
語言: | 英语 |
出版: |
Philipps-Universität Marburg
2022
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | PDF-Volltext |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
總結: | Cities are increasingly hold accountable for climate action. By demonstrating their pro-environmentality through own climate-related activities, they not at least aspire to encourage individual climate protection efforts. Based on standard economic theory there is little reason to assume that this is a promising strategy. Financed by taxpayers’ money, cities’ contributions are considered as substitutes that crowd-out private contributions to the same public good. Inspired by research on providing information on reference group behavior, we challenge this argument and conduct a framed-field experiment to analyze the impact of reference group information on the voluntary provision of a green public good. We investigate whether information on previous contributions by fellow citizens or the city affect individual contributions. We do not find statistical evidence that city-level information crowds-out additional individual contributions. A reference to fellow citizens significantly increases the share of contributors as it attracts subjects that are not per-se pro-environmentally oriented. |
---|---|
實物描述: | 35 Seiten |
ISSN: | 1867-3678 |
DOI: | 10.17192/es2024.0740 |