Motivate the Crowd or Crowd-them out? The Impact of Local Government spending on the Voluntary Provision of a Green Public Good
Cities are increasingly hold accountable for climate action. By demonstrating their pro-environmentality through own climate-related activities, they not at least aspire to encourage individual climate protection efforts. Based on standard economic theory there is little reason to assume that this i...
Сохранить в:
Опубликовано в:: | MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 33-2022) |
---|---|
Главные авторы: | , |
Формат: | Статья |
Язык: | английский |
Опубликовано: |
Philipps-Universität Marburg
2022
|
Предметы: | |
Online-ссылка: | PDF-полный текст |
Метки: |
Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
Итог: | Cities are increasingly hold accountable for climate action. By demonstrating their pro-environmentality through own climate-related activities, they not at least aspire to encourage individual climate protection efforts. Based on standard economic theory there is little reason to assume that this is a promising strategy. Financed by taxpayers’ money, cities’ contributions are considered as substitutes that crowd-out private contributions to the same public good. Inspired by research on providing information on reference group behavior, we challenge this argument and conduct a framed-field experiment to analyze the impact of reference group information on the voluntary provision of a green public good. We investigate whether information on previous contributions by fellow citizens or the city affect individual contributions. We do not find statistical evidence that city-level information crowds-out additional individual contributions. A reference to fellow citizens significantly increases the share of contributors as it attracts subjects that are not per-se pro-environmentally oriented. |
---|---|
Объем: | 35 Seiten |
ISSN: | 1867-3678 |
DOI: | 10.17192/es2024.0740 |