Publikationsserver
Do Credit Supply Shocks Have Asymmetric Effects?
They do. Partly. We identify credit supply shocks via sign restrictions in a Bayesian VAR and separate them into positive and negative. Using local projections, we find that positive credit supply shocks leave notably different prints in private debt, mortgage debt, and debt:GDP, as opposed to ne...
Enregistré dans:
| Publié dans: | MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 26-2020) |
|---|---|
| Auteurs principaux: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Langue: | anglais |
| Publié: |
Philipps-Universität Marburg
2020
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | Texte intégral en PDF |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| Résumé: | They do. Partly. We identify credit supply shocks via sign restrictions in
a Bayesian VAR and separate them into positive and negative. Using local
projections, we find that positive credit supply shocks leave notably different
prints in private debt, mortgage debt, and debt:GDP, as opposed to negative
credit supply shocks. This pattern is caused by the response of household
mortgage debt. Furthermore, we find evidence that positive credit supply
shocks are the driving force behind boom-bust cycles. Yet, developments
behind the boom-bust cycle cannot explain the strong and persistent response in debt; but house prices tend to. However, if we abstract from potential asymmetries, we get rather mild results, which underestimate the true effects of credit supply shocks. |
|---|---|
| Description matérielle: | 43 Seiten |
| ISSN: | 1867-3678 |
| DOI: | 10.17192/es2024.0653 |