The Labor Market Effects of Trade Union Heterogeneity

Empirical evidence suggests that the bargaining power of trade unions differs across firms and sectors. Standard models of unionization ignore this pattern by assuming a uniform bargaining strength. In this paper, we incorporate union heterogeneity into a Melitz (2003) type model. Union bargaining...

Whakaahuatanga katoa

I tiakina i:
Ngā taipitopito rārangi puna kōrero
I whakaputaina i:MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 23-2018)
Ngā kaituhi matua: de Pinto, Marco, Michaelis, Jochen
Hōputu: Tuhinga
Reo:Ingarihi
I whakaputaina: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2018
Ngā marau:
Urunga tuihono:Kuputuhi katoa PDF
Tags: Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Whakaahuatanga
Whakarāpopototanga:Empirical evidence suggests that the bargaining power of trade unions differs across firms and sectors. Standard models of unionization ignore this pattern by assuming a uniform bargaining strength. In this paper, we incorporate union heterogeneity into a Melitz (2003) type model. Union bargaining power is assumed to be firm-specific and varies with firm productivity. This framework allows us to re-analyze the labor market effects of (i) a symmetric increase in the bargaining power of all unions and (ii) trade liberalization. We show that union heterogeneity unambiguously reduces the negative employment effects of stronger unions. Firm-specific bargaining power creates a link between unionization and the entry and exit of firms, implying a reduction of the unions' expected bargaining power. Moreover, union heterogeneity constitutes an (un)employment effect of trade liberalization. If unions are most powerful in the high-productivity (low-productivity) firms, trade liberalization will increase (decrease) unemployment.
Whakaahuatanga ōkiko:40 Seiten
ISSN:1867-3678
DOI:10.17192/es2024.0577