Empirical Analysis of the Assessment of Innovation Effects in U.S. Merger Cases

In this empirical study all mergers that have been challenged by the U.S. antitrust agencies FTC and DOJ between 1995 and 2008 were analyzed in regard to the question to what extent and how the agencies assessed the innovation effects of mergers. Theoretical background is the still open question how...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

সংরক্ষণ করুন:
গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রকাশিত:MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 50-2014)
প্রধান লেখক: Kern, Benjamin R., Dewenter, Ralf, Kerber, Wolfgang
বিন্যাস: প্রবন্ধ
ভাষা:ইংরেজি
প্রকাশিত: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2014
বিষয়গুলি:
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:পিডিএফ এ সম্পূর্ন পাঠ
ট্যাগগুলো: ট্যাগ যুক্ত করুন
কোনো ট্যাগ নেই, প্রথমজন হিসাবে ট্যাগ করুন!
বিবরন
সংক্ষিপ্ত:In this empirical study all mergers that have been challenged by the U.S. antitrust agencies FTC and DOJ between 1995 and 2008 were analyzed in regard to the question to what extent and how the agencies assessed the innovation effects of mergers. Theoretical background is the still open question how negative effects of mergers on innovation should be taken into account in merger policy. Although we can show in our study that in one third of all challenged mergers also innovation concerns were raised, the results also point to a still existing large degree of uneasiness and inconsistencies of the agencies in regard to the assessment of innovation effects. A particularly interesting result is that - despite the wide-spread rejection of the "innovation market approach" in the antitrust debate - the agencies used more an innovationspecific assessment approach that includes also innovation in the market definition than the pure traditional product market concept. Additionally, we also found significant differences between the assessment approaches of the FTC and the DOJ.
দৈহিক বর্ননা:36 Seiten
আইএসএসএন:1867-3678
ডিওআই:10.17192/es2024.0341