How (Not) to Measure Institutions

The statement “institutions matter” has become commonplace. A precondition for it to be supported by empirical evidence, is, however, that institutions are measurable. Glaeser et al. (2004) attacks many studies claiming to prove the relevance of institutions for economic development as being based o...

Deskribapen osoa

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Argitaratua izan da:MAGKS - Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics (Band 37-2009)
Egile nagusia: Voigt, Stefan
Formatua: Artikulua
Hizkuntza:ingelesa
Argitaratua: Philipps-Universität Marburg 2009
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:PDF testu osoa
Etiketak: Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
Deskribapena
Gaia:The statement “institutions matter” has become commonplace. A precondition for it to be supported by empirical evidence, is, however, that institutions are measurable. Glaeser et al. (2004) attacks many studies claiming to prove the relevance of institutions for economic development as being based on flawed measures of institutions, or not even on institutions at all. This paper shows that their criticism deserves to be taken seriously, but that it is somewhat overblown. Some of the difficulties in measuring institutions are described and some ways of measuring them are proposed.
Deskribapen fisikoa:27 Seiten
ISSN:1867-3678
DOI:10.17192/es2024.0018